Suppr超能文献

将患者偏好证据纳入监管决策。

Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making.

作者信息

Ho Martin P, Gonzalez Juan Marcos, Lerner Herbert P, Neuland Carolyn Y, Whang Joyce M, McMurry-Heath Michelle, Hauber A Brett, Irony Telba

机构信息

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Building 66, Room 2232, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, USA.

RTI Health Solutions, Durham, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2984-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4044-2. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients have a unique role in deciding what treatments should be available for them and regulatory agencies should take their preferences into account when making treatment approval decisions. This is the first study designed to obtain quantitative patient-preference evidence to inform regulatory approval decisions by the Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

METHODS

Five-hundred and forty United States adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2) evaluated tradeoffs among effectiveness, safety, and other attributes of weight-loss devices in a scientific survey. Discrete-choice experiments were used to quantify the importance of safety, effectiveness, and other attributes of weight-loss devices to obese respondents. A tool based on these measures is being used to inform benefit-risk assessments for premarket approval of medical devices.

RESULTS

Respondent choices yielded preference scores indicating their relative value for attributes of weight-loss devices in this study. We developed a tool to estimate the minimum weight loss acceptable by a patient to receive a device with a given risk profile and the maximum mortality risk tolerable in exchange for a given weight loss. For example, to accept a device with 0.01 % mortality risk, a risk tolerant patient will require about 10 % total body weight loss lasting 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preference evidence was used make regulatory decision making more patient-centered. In addition, we captured the heterogeneity of patient preferences allowing market approval of effective devices for risk tolerant patients. CDRH is using the study tool to define minimum clinical effectiveness to evaluate new weight-loss devices. The methods presented can be applied to a wide variety of medical products. This study supports the ongoing development of a guidance document on incorporating patient preferences into medical-device premarket approval decisions.

摘要

背景

患者在决定自身可采用何种治疗方法方面具有独特作用,监管机构在做出治疗批准决策时应考虑患者的偏好。这是第一项旨在获取定量的患者偏好证据,以为美国食品药品监督管理局器械与放射健康中心的监管批准决策提供依据的研究。

方法

540名体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²的美国成年人在一项科学调查中评估了减肥器械在有效性、安全性及其他属性之间的权衡。采用离散选择实验来量化减肥器械的安全性、有效性及其他属性对肥胖受访者的重要性。基于这些测量结果的一种工具正被用于为医疗器械上市前批准的获益-风险评估提供依据。

结果

受访者的选择产生了偏好分数,表明了他们在本研究中对减肥器械各属性的相对重视程度。我们开发了一种工具,以估计患者为接受具有特定风险状况的器械可接受的最低体重减轻量,以及为换取特定体重减轻可容忍的最大死亡风险。例如,为接受一种死亡风险为0.01%的器械,一名风险容忍度高的患者将需要在5年内实现约10%的总体重减轻。

结论

患者偏好证据被用于使监管决策更以患者为中心。此外,我们捕捉到了患者偏好的异质性,从而使对风险容忍度高的患者有效的器械能够获得市场批准。器械与放射健康中心正在使用该研究工具来界定最低临床有效性,以评估新型减肥器械。所介绍的方法可应用于多种医疗产品。本研究支持正在进行的关于将患者偏好纳入医疗器械上市前批准决策的指导文件的制定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验