• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激励专科医生对农村工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案

Incentivizing Rural Work Preferences Among Specialist Physicians: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.

作者信息

Joshi Anushree, Panchamia Jallavi, Pandya Apurvakumar

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Management and Behavioral Science, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e59621. doi: 10.2196/59621.

DOI:10.2196/59621
PMID:39652867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retaining specialist physicians in rural parts of India poses a fundamental challenge, which affects the health care system's functionality and provision of standard health care services. There has been an acute shortfall of specialist physicians in the fields of medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery at rural community health centers. This necessitates urgent policy focus to address the shortages and design effective rural retention strategies. In this study, which uses a discrete choice experiment (DCE), individuals choose from multiple-choice preferences that resemble hypothetical job descriptions.

OBJECTIVE

DCEs are a quantitative approach to assessing several aspects of job selection. This study aims to develop a detailed plan of a DCE method used to determine specialist physicians' job choices. This protocol outlines the DCE method, which uses an exploratory sequential mixed methods research design to understand specialist physicians' preferences and design reward packages that would effectively motivate them to work in underserved regions.

METHODS

The qualitative phase of the study involved identifying job attributes and their corresponding levels for the DCE. We followed a meticulous process, which included reviewing relevant literature, performing qualitative pilot work, conducting in-depth individual interviews, and consulting with medical and health experts. The quantitative phase involved generating a D-efficient orthogonal fractional factorial design using Ngene software to create choice scenarios using the identified job factors and their corresponding levels. The generated choice scenarios were blocked into 6 versions in 6 blocks. The DCE was undertaken among final-year postgraduate medical residents and specialist physicians from several health care facilities in Rajasthan. Various statistical models will be applied to explore the response variability and quantify the trade-offs that participants are willing to make for nonmonetary features as a substitute for adjustments in the monetary attribute.

RESULTS

After the ethics committee's approval of the study, the qualitative data collection phase occurred from September to December 2021, while the quantitative phase took place from May to August 2022. Six attributes and 14 levels were identified and established through qualitative surveys. The experimental design resulted in 36 choice situations, which were grouped into 6 blocks. The preliminary investigation demonstrated that the instrument was valid and reliable. Statistical data analysis has been initiated, and the principal findings are expected to be disseminated in January 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

The protocol provides a systematic framework to assess specialist physicians' preferences regarding working in rural health care centers. This research has the potential to substantially influence the future of rural health care by laying the foundation for understanding specialist physicians' choices, which will help design future incentive schemes, policy interventions, and research.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/59621.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11667135/6ae7272cbefa/resprot_v13i1e59621_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11667135/56f77cabef6d/resprot_v13i1e59621_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11667135/6ae7272cbefa/resprot_v13i1e59621_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11667135/56f77cabef6d/resprot_v13i1e59621_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11667135/6ae7272cbefa/resprot_v13i1e59621_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

在印度农村地区留住专科医生是一项根本性挑战,这影响着医疗保健系统的功能以及标准医疗服务的提供。农村社区卫生中心在医学、儿科、妇产科和外科等领域的专科医生严重短缺。这就需要政策紧急关注以解决短缺问题并制定有效的农村留住策略。在本研究中,采用离散选择实验(DCE),让个体从类似于假设工作描述的多项选择偏好中进行选择。

目的

DCE是一种评估工作选择多个方面的定量方法。本研究旨在制定一个详细的DCE方法计划,用于确定专科医生的工作选择。本方案概述了DCE方法,该方法采用探索性序列混合方法研究设计来了解专科医生的偏好,并设计能有效激励他们在服务不足地区工作的薪酬方案。

方法

研究的定性阶段涉及确定DCE的工作属性及其相应水平。我们遵循了一个细致的过程,包括查阅相关文献、开展定性试点工作、进行深入的个人访谈以及咨询医学和健康专家。定量阶段涉及使用Ngene软件生成一个D效率正交分式析因设计,以利用确定的工作因素及其相应水平创建选择情景。生成的选择情景被分成6个区组的6个版本。DCE在拉贾斯坦邦几家医疗机构的医学研究生最后一年学员和专科医生中进行。将应用各种统计模型来探索反应变异性,并量化参与者愿意为非货币特征做出的权衡,以替代货币属性的调整。

结果

在伦理委员会批准该研究后,定性数据收集阶段于2021年9月至12月进行,而定量阶段于2022年5月至8月进行。通过定性调查确定并确立了6个属性和14个水平。实验设计产生了36种选择情况,分为6个区组。初步调查表明该工具有效且可靠。统计数据分析已启动,主要研究结果预计于2025年1月发布。

结论

该方案提供了一个系统框架,以评估专科医生对在农村医疗中心工作的偏好。这项研究有可能通过为理解专科医生的选择奠定基础,从而对农村医疗保健的未来产生重大影响,这将有助于设计未来的激励计划、政策干预措施和研究。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/59621。

相似文献

1
Incentivizing Rural Work Preferences Among Specialist Physicians: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.激励专科医生对农村工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e59621. doi: 10.2196/59621.
2
Developing a Discrete Choice Experiment Questionnaire to Design Health Policy Interventions for Rural Retention of Specialist Physicians in Rajasthan, India.设计一份离散选择实验问卷,以制定印度拉贾斯坦邦农村地区留住专科医生的卫生政策干预措施。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 20;16(12):e76073. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76073. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Rural clinician scarcity and job preferences of doctors and nurses in India: a discrete choice experiment.印度农村临床医生短缺与医生和护士工作偏好:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082984. eCollection 2013.
4
Incentives for non-physician health professionals to work in the rural and remote areas of Mozambique--a discrete choice experiment for eliciting job preferences.激励非医师卫生专业人员到莫桑比克农村和偏远地区工作——一项用于引出工作偏好的离散选择实验。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Apr 26;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0015-5.
5
Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment.评估赞比亚农村吸引和留住卫生工作者的干预措施:离散选择实验。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Apr 3;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3.
6
Addressing concerns of access and distribution of health workforce: a discrete choice experiment to develop rural attraction and retention strategies in southwestern Ethiopia.解决卫生人力获取与分配问题:一项关于制定埃塞俄比亚西南部农村吸引和留住人才战略的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11971-4.
7
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
8
Job preferences of undergraduate nursing students in eastern China: a discrete choice experiment.中国东部本科护生工作偏好的离散选择实验研究
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0335-3.
9
Employment preferences of obstetricians and gynecologists to work in the district hospitals: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Nepal.尼泊尔地区医院妇产科医生工作偏好的离散选择实验证据。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 9;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0427-8.
10
Registered nurses' preferences for rural and urban jobs: A discrete choice experiment.注册护士对农村和城市工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-aligning Incentives to Address Informal Payments in Tanzania Public Health Facilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment.重新调整坦桑尼亚公立医疗机构的激励机制以解决非正式支付问题:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6877. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6877. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
2
What are the job attribute preferences of physicians and nurses in Türkiye? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.土耳其医生和护士的工作属性偏好是什么?来自离散选择实验的证据。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Jun 28;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00826-4.
3
Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia: Discrete Choice Experiment.
青少年和家长对缺牙症的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Dent Res. 2022 Dec;101(13):1590-1596. doi: 10.1177/00220345221111386. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Size, composition and distribution of health workforce in India: why, and where to invest?印度卫生人力的规模、构成和分布:为什么投资?以及投资何处?
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00575-2.
5
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.与健康技术相关的离散选择实验应包含哪些属性?系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905. eCollection 2019.
6
A Guide to Measuring and Interpreting Attribute Importance.属性重要性的测量和解释指南。
Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):287-295. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00360-3.
7
Developing attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment on basic health insurance in Iran.为伊朗基本医疗保险的离散选择实验确定属性和水平。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Mar 28;32:26. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.26. eCollection 2018.
8
Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.遵循良好研究实践建议开展离散选择实验研究:一项用于引出患者对糖尿病治疗偏好的应用研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量:我们如何评估有效性和可靠性?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Health workforce in India: assessment of availability, production and distribution.印度的卫生人力:可及性、培养与分布评估
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;2(2):106-112. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.122944.