• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者偏好科学的下一步是什么?互操作性、标准化和可转移性。

What Next for the Science of Patient Preference? Interoperability, Standardization, and Transferability.

作者信息

Marsh Kevin, Sepulveda Juan Marcos Gonzalez, Berlin Conny, Levitan Bennett, Boeri Marco, Groothuis-Oudshoorn Catharina G M, Crossnohere Norah L, Jimenez-Moreno Cecilia, Liden Barry, Stoeckert Isabelle, Veldwijk Jorien, Watt Stephen, Hauber Brett

机构信息

Evidera, London, UK.

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9
PMID:39873903
Abstract

Using patient preference information (PPI) to incorporate patient voices into the drug development lifecycle can help align therapies with the needs and values of patients. However, several barriers have limited the use of PPI, including a lack of clarity on its use by decision-makers, a need for greater decision-maker trust in PPI, and a lack of time, budgets, and access to specialist expertise. The value proposition for PPI could be enhanced by making it FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. To support the development of a research agenda to deliver FAIR PPI, we reviewed related endeavors in the development of repositories of existing studies, disease models, benefit transfer, and common data standards. We concluded that developing FAIR PPI would require advances in the science of PPI, including the establishment of a consortium, mirroring the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OPOM), to develop PPI data standards, and research into the sources of variation in patient preferences. This will require the science of PPI to graduate from being a body of empirical observations to developing theories that explain variations in patient preferences, simultaneously driving both efficiency in the generation of PPI and trust in PPI.

摘要

利用患者偏好信息(PPI)将患者声音纳入药物开发生命周期,有助于使治疗方法与患者的需求和价值观保持一致。然而,一些障碍限制了PPI的使用,包括决策者对其使用缺乏清晰认识、决策者对PPI的信任度有待提高,以及缺乏时间、预算和获取专业知识的途径。通过使其具备FAIR特性(即可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用),可以提升PPI的价值主张。为了支持制定实现FAIR PPI的研究议程,我们回顾了现有研究库、疾病模型、效益转移和通用数据标准开发方面的相关工作。我们得出结论,开发FAIR PPI需要PPI科学取得进展,包括成立一个类似于临床数据交换标准协会(CDISC)或观察性医疗结局合作组织(OPOM)的联盟,以制定PPI数据标准,并对患者偏好的变异来源进行研究。这将要求PPI科学从一系列实证观察发展为能够解释患者偏好变异的理论,同时提高PPI生成的效率和对PPI的信任度。

相似文献

1
What Next for the Science of Patient Preference? Interoperability, Standardization, and Transferability.患者偏好科学的下一步是什么?互操作性、标准化和可转移性。
Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
"We're all in it together": uniting a diverse range of professionals and people with lived experience within the development of a complex, theory-based paediatric speech and language therapy intervention.“我们同舟共济”:在一项基于理论的复杂儿科言语和语言治疗干预措施的开发过程中,团结各类专业人员以及有实际经验的人士。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00738-8.
6
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
7
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
10
Implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) Principles in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research: Mixed Methods Approach.在儿童和青少年心理健康研究中实施可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用(FAIR)原则:混合方法研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 19;11:e59113. doi: 10.2196/59113.

本文引用的文献

1
A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist.健康领域离散选择实验报告清单:DIRECT 清单。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Oct;42(10):1161-1175. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Research Priorities to Increase Confidence in and Acceptance of Health Preference Research: What Questions Should be Prioritized Now?优先研究事项以增强健康偏好研究的信心和接受度:现在应优先考虑哪些问题?
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00650-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
3
Current Practices and Challenges When Submitting Patient Experience Data for Regulatory Decisions by the US Food and Drug Administration: An Industry Survey.
当美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在监管决策中提交患者体验数据时的现行做法和挑战:一项行业调查。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):147-159. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00653-8. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Non-Fusion Versus Fusion Surgery in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Trade-Offs in Outcomes Are Acceptable for the Patient and Family?非融合手术与融合手术治疗儿童特发性脊柱侧凸:对于患者及其家庭来说,什么样的结果取舍是可以接受的?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jan 3;106(1):2-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00503. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Preferences for potential benefits and risks for gene therapy in the treatment of sickle cell disease.对基因疗法治疗镰状细胞病的潜在益处和风险的偏好。
Blood Adv. 2023 Dec 12;7(23):7371-7381. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009680.
6
Patient-Centered Clinical Trial Design for Heart Failure Devices via Bayesian Decision Analysis.基于贝叶斯决策分析的心力衰竭器械以患者为中心的临床试验设计。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):359-369. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00623-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
Adaptation of the WOMAC for Use in a Patient Preference Study.WOMAC 量表的适应性调整,用于患者偏好研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):702-711. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00510-8. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
8
Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment in Medical Product Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.医学产品决策中的定量获益-风险评估:ISPOR 工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2023 Apr;26(4):449-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.006.
9
A Roadmap for Increasing the Usefulness and Impact of Patient-Preference Studies in Decision Making in Health: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.提高患者偏好研究在健康决策中有用性和影响力的路线图:ISPOR 工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):153-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.004.
10
Patient Preferences in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results of a Multinational Discrete Choice Experiment in Europe.患者对化脓性汗腺炎管理的偏好:欧洲多国离散选择实验的结果。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):153-164. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00614-7. Epub 2023 Jan 11.