Ericksen Hayley M, Thomas Abbey C, Gribble Phillip A, Doebel Sara C, Pietrosimone Brian G
Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;45(2):112-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.4997. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
Randomized controlled trial.
To determine if the addition of real-time feedback (RTF) to postresponse feedback (PRF) improves jump-landing kinematics compared to PRF alone and a no-feedback control group.
Injury-prevention programs to reduce risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury have shown promising results in altering jump-landing biomechanics. Real-time feedback provided during the task may allow participants to more easily understand and execute new movement strategies compared to PRF provided after the task is completed.
Thirty-six healthy females were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: RTF plus PRF, PRF, or control. Sagittal plane moments and angles at the knee and hip, frontal plane angles at the knee, and vertical ground reaction forces during a jump-landing task were quantified at baseline and postintervention. The RTF plus PRF and PRF groups received a PowerPoint presentation containing the goals of correct landing technique. In addition to the PowerPoint presentation, the RTF plus PRF group was provided real-time visualization of their frontal plane knee angle. Participants in the control group performed the jump-landing task without feedback.
Posttraining, the RTF plus PRF and PRF groups demonstrated similar improvements in hip and knee flexion and decreased vertical ground reaction forces compared to the control group. There were no changes in frontal plane knee kinematics between groups posttraining.
The addition of RTF to PRF did not result in significant changes in jump-landing kinematics compared to PRF alone.
Prevention, level 5.
随机对照试验。
确定与仅采用反应后反馈(PRF)及无反馈对照组相比,在反应后反馈(PRF)基础上增加实时反馈(RTF)是否能改善跳跃着陆的运动学特征。
旨在降低前交叉韧带损伤风险的预防计划在改变跳跃着陆生物力学方面已显示出有前景的结果。与任务完成后提供的PRF相比,任务过程中提供的实时反馈可能使参与者更容易理解和执行新的运动策略。
36名健康女性被随机分为3组中的1组:RTF加PRF组、PRF组或对照组。在基线和干预后,对跳跃着陆任务期间膝关节和髋关节的矢状面力矩和角度、膝关节的额状面角度以及垂直地面反作用力进行量化。RTF加PRF组和PRF组接受了包含正确着陆技术目标的PowerPoint演示文稿。除了PowerPoint演示文稿外,RTF加PRF组还能实时看到其膝关节额状面角度的可视化图像。对照组的参与者在无反馈的情况下进行跳跃着陆任务。
训练后,与对照组相比,RTF加PRF组和PRF组在髋关节和膝关节屈曲方面有类似改善,垂直地面反作用力减小。训练后各组之间膝关节额状面运动学特征无变化。
与仅采用PRF相比,在PRF基础上增加RTF并未导致跳跃着陆运动学特征发生显著变化。
预防,5级。