Fukui Toshihiro
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan,
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;63(3):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0512-9. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an established revascularization method for treating multivessel coronary artery disease. The goal of CABG is to achieve complete revascularization with a durable, patent graft without reintervention. However, early graft failure, including that associated with technical errors, has been reported. This makes intraoperative verification of graft patency one of the most important ways in which surgeons can reduce the rate of early graft failure. Conventional angiography is considered the gold standard for graft assessment. However, because it is invasive and inconvenient, several alternatives to intraoperative graft assessment have become available that help reduce early graft failure by allowing revision of the anastomosis intraoperatively. The aim of this article is to review the advantages and disadvantages of several intraoperative graft assessment methods for CABG.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种成熟的用于治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的血运重建方法。CABG的目标是通过使用耐用、通畅且无需再次干预的移植物实现完全血运重建。然而,已有报道称存在早期移植物失败的情况,包括与技术失误相关的失败。这使得术中验证移植物通畅性成为外科医生降低早期移植物失败率的最重要方法之一。传统血管造影被认为是移植物评估的金标准。然而,由于其具有侵入性且不便,现已出现几种术中移植物评估的替代方法,这些方法通过允许术中修正吻合口来帮助降低早期移植物失败率。本文的目的是综述几种用于CABG的术中移植物评估方法的优缺点。