Shiono Yasutsugu, Kubo Takashi, Honda Kentaro, Katayama Yosuke, Aoki Hiroshi, Satogami Keisuke, Kashiyama Kuninobu, Taruya Akira, Nishiguchi Tsuyoshi, Kuroi Akio, Orii Makoto, Kameyama Takeyoshi, Yamano Takashi, Yamaguchi Tomoyuki, Matsuo Yoshiki, Ino Yasushi, Tanaka Atsushi, Hozumi Takeshi, Nishimura Yoshiharu, Okamura Yoshitaka, Akasaka Takashi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.052. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Pressure guidewire pullback recording can differentiate between functional focal and diffuse disease types in coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency between patients with functional focal versus diffuse disease types in recipient coronary arteries.
We investigated 89 patients who underwent pressure guidewire pullback in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery before CABG using internal mammary artery (IMA). Based on the pressure guidewire pullback data, the LAD lesions were classified into functional focal disease (abrupt pressure step-up; n=58) or functional diffuse disease (gradual pressure increase; n=31). Follow-up computed tomography (CT) angiography was conducted within 1year after CABG to assess the bypass graft patency. Pre CABG, LAD angiographic percent diameter stenosis (57±10% vs. 54±12%, p=0.228) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) (0.68±0.07 vs. 0.69±0.07, p=0.244) were not different between the functional focal and diffuse disease groups. The CABG procedure characteristics were similarly comparable between the two groups. In the follow-up CT angiography after CABG, occlusion or string sign of the IMA graft to LAD was more frequently observed in the functional diffuse disease group than in the functional focal disease group (26% vs. 7%, p=0.021).
In CABG, functional diffuse disease in the recipient coronary artery was associated with an increased risk of the graft failure in comparison with functional focal disease.
压力导丝回撤记录可区分冠心病中功能性局灶性和弥漫性疾病类型。本研究的目的是比较接受冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者中,受体冠状动脉功能性局灶性与弥漫性疾病类型之间的冠状动脉搭桥移植血管通畅情况。
我们调查了89例在CABG术前使用乳内动脉(IMA)对左前降支(LAD)动脉进行压力导丝回撤的患者。根据压力导丝回撤数据,将LAD病变分为功能性局灶性疾病(压力突然升高;n = 58)或功能性弥漫性疾病(压力逐渐升高;n = 31)。在CABG术后1年内进行随访计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影,以评估搭桥移植血管的通畅情况。CABG术前,功能性局灶性和弥漫性疾病组之间的LAD血管造影直径狭窄百分比(57±10%对54±12%,p = 0.228)和血流储备分数(FFR)(0.68±0.07对0.69±0.07,p = 0.244)无差异。两组之间的CABG手术特征同样具有可比性。在CABG术后的随访CT血管造影中,功能性弥漫性疾病组比功能性局灶性疾病组更频繁地观察到IMA移植至LAD的闭塞或串珠征(26%对7%,p = 0.021)。
在CABG中,与功能性局灶性疾病相比,受体冠状动脉中的功能性弥漫性疾病与移植血管失败风险增加相关。