Obertová Zuzana, Lawrenson Ross, Scott Nina, Holmes Michael, Brown Charis, Lao Chunhuan, Tyrie Leanne, Gilling Peter
Waikato Clinical School, Peter Rothwell Academic Centre, University of Auckland, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand,
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;20(4):814-20. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0781-4. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
To examine diagnostic and treatment pathways for Māori (the indigenous people of New Zealand [NZ]) and NZ European men with prostate cancer in order to identify causes of higher mortality rates for Māori men.
All Māori men (150) diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Midland Cancer Network region between 2007 and 2010 were identified from the NZ Cancer Registry and frequency age-matched with three randomly sampled NZ European men. Clinical records of these men were searched for information on clinical stage at diagnosis, comorbidities, and type of treatment for localised disease.
The final cohort included 136 Māori and 400 NZ European men, of whom 97 Māori and 311 NZ European were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer. Māori men were twice as likely to be diagnosed with distant metastases compared with NZ European men (19.1 vs 9.8 %). Māori men with localised disease were less likely to be treated with radical prostatectomy compared with NZ European men [RR 0.66 (95 % CI 0.48, 0.90)]. Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, D'Amico risk strata, comorbidities, and socioeconomic deprivation showed that Māori men were more likely to be managed expectantly [RR 1.74 (95 % CI 1.06, 2.57)].
Differences between Māori and NZ European men observed in the management of localised prostate cancer cannot be readily explained by patient characteristics, such as comorbidities or risk assessment at diagnosis. Poorer outcomes for Māori men may not only be related to later stage at diagnosis but differences in treatment modalities may also be a factor.
研究新西兰原住民毛利族男性和欧洲裔新西兰男性前列腺癌的诊断与治疗途径,以确定毛利族男性死亡率较高的原因。
从新西兰癌症登记处识别出2007年至2010年间在中部癌症网络地区被诊断为前列腺癌的所有毛利族男性(150人),并按年龄频率与随机抽取的三名欧洲裔新西兰男性进行匹配。查阅这些男性的临床记录,以获取有关诊断时临床分期、合并症以及局限性疾病治疗类型的信息。
最终队列包括136名毛利族男性和400名欧洲裔新西兰男性,其中97名毛利族男性和311名欧洲裔新西兰男性被诊断为局限性前列腺癌。与欧洲裔新西兰男性相比,毛利族男性被诊断为远处转移的可能性是其两倍(19.1%对9.8%)。与欧洲裔新西兰男性相比,患有局限性疾病的毛利族男性接受根治性前列腺切除术的可能性较小[相对风险0.66(95%可信区间0.48,0.90)]。经年龄、达米科风险分层、合并症和社会经济剥夺因素调整的多变量回归分析显示,毛利族男性更有可能接受观察等待治疗[相对风险1.74(95%可信区间1.06,2.57)]。
在局限性前列腺癌管理方面观察到的毛利族男性与欧洲裔新西兰男性之间的差异,不能轻易用患者特征(如合并症或诊断时的风险评估)来解释。毛利族男性较差的治疗结果可能不仅与诊断时较晚的分期有关,治疗方式的差异也可能是一个因素。