Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.228. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
Eating competence is an important behavioral construct, shown to be associated with healthful lifestyle practices, including dietary quality, weight management, physical activity, and sleep duration. A 16-item instrument to measure eating competence, the Satter Eating Competence Inventory was previously validated in a general sample and subsequently, a 16-item instrument was developed to address specific concerns of low-income persons; 12 items were common to both instruments. The purpose of this study was to determine if the low-income version could be applied to a general audience, simplifying intervention evaluation and facilitating cross-study comparison. Both surveys were fully completed by 127 parents (89% white; 35.8 ± 5.3 y; 86% college graduates; 51% eating competent) of preschool-age children; 96 of whom were not considered low-income. Cognitive interviews with 14 parents of varying eating competence levels clarified and confirmed findings. Scores were highly correlated (r = .98) and only 2 of the 96 were not congruently classified for eating competence. Mean difference between the two versions was .24 ± 1.55. The general audience version explained 95% of the variance in the low-income version score. Findings support the low-income version of the Satter Eating Competence Inventory for general audience use as the Satter Eating Competence Inventory 2.0.
进食能力是一种重要的行为结构,与健康的生活方式实践有关,包括饮食质量、体重管理、身体活动和睡眠时长。Satter 进食能力量表是一种用于衡量进食能力的 16 项工具,先前已在一般人群中得到验证,随后又开发了一种 16 项工具,以解决低收入人群的特殊问题;两种工具共有 12 项。本研究旨在确定低收入人群版本是否可应用于一般人群,简化干预评估并促进跨研究比较。127 名学龄前儿童的家长(89%为白人;35.8±5.3 岁;86%大学毕业;51%进食能力良好)完成了这两项调查;其中 96 名家长不属于低收入人群。对不同进食能力水平的 14 名家长进行的认知访谈澄清并证实了研究结果。得分高度相关(r=.98),仅 96 名中的 2 名在进食能力方面的分类不一致。两种版本之间的平均差异为.24±1.55。一般人群版本解释了低收入人群版本分数的 95%。研究结果支持将 Satter 进食能力量表的低收入人群版本用于一般人群,作为 Satter 进食能力量表 2.0。