Frevert Jürgen
Head of Botulinum Toxin Research, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Hermannswerder 15, 14473, Potsdam, Germany,
Drugs R D. 2015 Mar;15(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40268-014-0077-1.
Botulinum neurotoxin injections are a valuable treatment modality for many therapeutic indications and have revolutionized the field of aesthetic medicine so that they are the leading cosmetic procedure performed worldwide. Studies show that onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy. Differences between the products relate to the botulinum neurotoxin complexes, specific biological potency, and their immunogenicity. Protein complex size and molecular weight have no effect on biological activity, stability, distribution, or side effect profile. Complexing proteins and inactive toxin (toxoid) content increase the risk of neutralizing antibody formation, which can cause secondary treatment failure, particularly in chronic disorders that require frequent injections and long-term treatment. These attributes could lead to differences in therapeutic outcomes, and, given the widespread aesthetic use of these three neurotoxin products, physicians should be aware of how they differ to ensure their safe and effective use.
肉毒杆菌神经毒素注射是许多治疗适应症的一种有价值的治疗方式,并且彻底改变了美容医学领域,使其成为全球范围内执行的领先美容手术。研究表明,A型肉毒毒素、阿毒素和因卡毒素在临床疗效方面具有可比性。产品之间的差异与肉毒杆菌神经毒素复合物、特定生物效力及其免疫原性有关。蛋白质复合物大小和分子量对生物活性、稳定性、分布或副作用概况没有影响。复合蛋白和无活性毒素(类毒素)含量增加了中和抗体形成的风险,这可能导致二次治疗失败,特别是在需要频繁注射和长期治疗的慢性疾病中。这些特性可能导致治疗结果的差异,并且鉴于这三种神经毒素产品在美容方面的广泛使用,医生应该了解它们之间的差异,以确保安全有效地使用。