• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种电子学习方法用于正畸学本科学生头影测量教学的评估

Assessment of two e-learning methods teaching undergraduate students cephalometry in orthodontics.

作者信息

Ludwig B, Bister D, Schott T C, Lisson J A, Hourfar J

机构信息

Private practice, Traben-Trarbach, Germany.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Homburg/Saar, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Dent Educ. 2016 Feb;20(1):20-5. doi: 10.1111/eje.12135. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1111/eje.12135
PMID:25560366
Abstract

AIM

Cephalometry is important for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning and is part of the core curriculum for training dentists. Training involves identifying anatomical landmarks. The aim of this investigation was to assess whether e-learning improves learning efficiency; a programme specifically designed for this purpose was compared to commercially available software.

METHODS

Thirty undergraduate students underwent traditional training of cephalometry consisting of lectures and tutorials. Tracing skills were tested immediately afterwards (T0). The students were then randomly allocated to three groups: 10 students served as control (CF); they were asked to improve their skills using the material provided so far. Ten students were given a program specifically designed for this study that was based on a power point presentation (PPT). The last group was given a commercially available program that included teaching elements (SW). The groups were tested at the end the six week training (T1). The test consisted of tracing 30 points on two radiographs and a point score improvement was calculated. The students were interviewed after the second test.

RESULTS

Both e-learning groups improved more than the traditional group. Improvement scores were four for CF; 8.6 for PPT and 2.8 for SW. For PPT all participants improved and the student feedback was the best compared to the other groups. For the other groups some candidates worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

Blended learning produced better learning outcomes compared to using a traditional teaching method alone. The easy to use Power Point based custom software produced better results than the commercially available software.

摘要

目的

头影测量对于正畸诊断和治疗计划很重要,是牙科医生培训核心课程的一部分。培训包括识别解剖标志点。本研究的目的是评估电子学习是否能提高学习效率;将为此专门设计的一个程序与市售软件进行比较。

方法

30名本科生接受了由讲座和辅导课组成的传统头影测量培训。之后立即测试描图技能(T0)。然后将学生随机分为三组:10名学生作为对照组(CF);要求他们使用到目前为止提供的材料提高技能。10名学生被给予一个为此研究专门设计的基于幻灯片演示文稿(PPT)的程序。最后一组被给予一个包含教学元素的市售程序(SW)。在六周培训结束时(T1)对各小组进行测试。测试包括在两张X光片上描出30个点,并计算得分提高情况。第二次测试后对学生进行访谈。

结果

两个电子学习组的进步都超过了传统组。CF组的进步分数为4分;PPT组为8.6分,SW组为2.8分。对于PPT组,所有参与者都有进步,与其他组相比,学生反馈最好。对于其他组,一些参与者的表现变差了。

结论

与仅使用传统教学方法相比,混合式学习产生了更好的学习效果。基于幻灯片的易于使用的定制软件比市售软件产生了更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Assessment of two e-learning methods teaching undergraduate students cephalometry in orthodontics.两种电子学习方法用于正畸学本科学生头影测量教学的评估
Eur J Dent Educ. 2016 Feb;20(1):20-5. doi: 10.1111/eje.12135. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
2
[The integration of a computer learning program for x-ray cephalometric analysis into student training].[将用于X线头颅测量分析的计算机学习程序整合到学生培训中]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993 Jun;54(3):129-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02409022.
3
Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.新型医学教育方法:与传统基于讲座的教学模式相比,使用互动式医学软件可提高学生的保留率。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007.
4
An evaluation of a hypertext system for computer-assisted learning in orthodontics.
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):145-8. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.145.
5
The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.使用观众反应系统对本科牙科学生正畸教学中的学习、动机和信息保留的影响:一项交叉试验。
J Orthod. 2015 Jun;42(2):123-35. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000129. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
6
Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances.学习者控制与程序控制的教学多媒体:正畸矫治器原理教学中两种交互方式的比较
Eur J Dent Educ. 2005 Nov;9(4):157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00385.x.
7
Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates.面授、混合式和电子学习的效果和可接受性:正畸本科生的随机试验。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2011 May;15(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00651.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students.评估电子学习模块在向医科大学生传授放射防护课程方面的可行性和有效性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Mar;9(3):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.09.014.
9
Students' attitudes towards an on-line orthodontic learning resource.学生对正畸在线学习资源的态度。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2009 May;13(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00545.x.
10
Evaluation of computer-aided learning in orthodontics.正畸学中计算机辅助学习的评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative accuracy of artificial intelligence-based AudaxCeph software, Dolphin software, and the manual technique for orthodontic landmark identification and tracing of lateral cephalograms.基于人工智能的AudaxCeph软件、Dolphin软件以及手动技术在正畸标志点识别和头颅侧位片描记方面的比较准确性。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2025 Mar;55(1):11-21. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240089. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
2
Effectiveness of screen-to-screen and face-to-face learning modalities in dental anatomy module during Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间,口腔解剖学模块中屏幕对屏幕和面对面学习模式的效果。
Anat Sci Educ. 2022 Jan;15(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/ase.2150. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Comparison between Virtual and Traditional Learning Methods for Orthodontic Knowledge and Skills in Dental Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
牙科学生正畸知识与技能的虚拟学习方法与传统学习方法比较:一项准实验研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;9(9):1092. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091092.
4
Education Technology in Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.正畸和儿童牙科领域的 COVID-19 大流行期间的教育技术:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6056. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116056.
5
An systematic review of e-learning outcomes in undergraduate dental radiology curricula-levels of learning and implications for researchers and curriculum planners.本科牙科放射学课程中电子学习成果的系统评价——学习水平及对研究人员和课程规划者的启示
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):20180027. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180027. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
A survey of undergraduate orthodontic teaching and factors affecting pursuit of postgraduate training.一项关于本科正畸教学及影响研究生培训深造因素的调查。
Br Dent J. 2016 Oct 21;221(8):487-492. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.778.
7
An assessment of student experiences and learning based on a novel undergraduate e-learning resource.基于一种新型本科电子学习资源对学生体验和学习情况的评估。
Br Dent J. 2016 Aug 12;221(3):131-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.563.