Suppr超能文献

将儿科健康差异研究与质量改进科学相结合。

Partnering health disparities research with quality improvement science in pediatrics.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; and.

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):354-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2982. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

Abstract

Disparities in pediatric health care quality are well described in the literature, yet practical approaches to decreasing them remain elusive. Quality improvement (QI) approaches are appealing for addressing disparities because they offer a set of strategies by which to target modifiable aspects of care delivery and a method for tailoring or changing an intervention over time based on data monitoring. However, few examples in the literature exist of QI interventions successfully decreasing disparities, particularly in pediatrics, due to well-described challenges in developing, implementing, and studying QI with vulnerable populations or in underresourced settings. In addition, QI interventions aimed at improving quality overall may not improve disparities, and in some cases, may worsen them if there is greater uptake or effectiveness of the intervention among the population with better outcomes at baseline. In this article, the authors review some of the challenges faced by researchers and frontline clinicians seeking to use QI to address health disparities and propose an agenda for moving the field forward. Specifically, they propose that those designing and implementing disparities-focused QI interventions reconsider comparator groups, use more rigorous evaluation methods, carefully consider the evidence for particular interventions and the context in which they were developed, directly engage the social determinants of health, and leverage community resources to build collaborative networks and engage community members. Ultimately, new partnerships between communities, providers serving vulnerable populations, and QI researchers will be required for QI interventions to achieve their potential related to health care disparity reduction.

摘要

儿科医疗质量的差异在文献中已有详细描述,但减少这些差异的实用方法仍难以捉摸。质量改进 (QI) 方法对于解决差异很有吸引力,因为它们提供了一组策略,可以针对护理提供的可修改方面,并提供了一种根据数据监测随时间调整或改变干预措施的方法。然而,由于在脆弱人群或资源匮乏环境中开发、实施和研究 QI 方面存在众所周知的挑战,文献中几乎没有 QI 干预成功减少差异的例子,尤其是在儿科领域。此外,旨在提高整体质量的 QI 干预措施可能不会改善差异,如果在具有更好基线结果的人群中,干预措施的接受程度或效果更高,则可能会使差异恶化。在本文中,作者回顾了研究人员和一线临床医生在寻求使用 QI 来解决健康差异方面所面临的一些挑战,并提出了推进该领域的议程。具体来说,他们建议那些设计和实施以差异为重点的 QI 干预措施的人重新考虑对照组,使用更严格的评估方法,仔细考虑特定干预措施的证据以及它们开发的背景,直接参与健康的社会决定因素,并利用社区资源建立协作网络并让社区成员参与进来。最终,社区、为弱势群体服务的提供者和 QI 研究人员之间需要建立新的伙伴关系,以便 QI 干预措施能够发挥潜力,减少医疗保健方面的差异。

相似文献

2
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.合作网络,用于改进和研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S210-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H.

引用本文的文献

7
Advancing Equitable Ambulatory Telehealth Through Dashboard Development.通过仪表板开发推进公平的门诊远程医疗
Telemed Rep. 2024 Jul 29;5(1):219-223. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2024.0033. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

5
A tall order: improve child health.一项艰巨的任务:改善儿童健康。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验