Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354982, Seattle, WA, 98195-4982, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington, Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1360, Seattle, WA, 98101-1466, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11471-5.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death and the second most common cancer diagnosis among the Hispanic population in the United States. However, CRC screening prevalence remains lower among Hispanic adults than among non-Hispanic white adults. To reduce CRC screening disparities, efforts to implement CRC screening evidence-based interventions in primary care organizations (PCOs) must consider their potential effect on existing screening disparities. More research is needed to understand how to leverage existing implementation science methodologies to improve health disparities. The Coaching to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Equity (CoachIQ) pilot study explores whether integrating two implementation science tools, Causal Pathway Diagrams and practice facilitation, is a feasible and effective way to address CRC screening disparities among Hispanic patients.
We used a quasi-experimental, mixed methods design to evaluate feasibility and assess initial signals of effectiveness of the CoachIQ approach. Three PCOs received coaching from CoachIQ practice facilitators over a 12-month period. Three non-equivalent comparison group PCOs received coaching during the same period as participants in a state quality improvement program. We conducted descriptive analyses of screening rates and coaching activities.
The CoachIQ practice facilitators discussed equity, facilitated prioritization of QI activities, and reviewed CRC screening disparities during a higher proportion of coaching encounters than the comparison group practice facilitator. While the mean overall CRC screening rate in the comparison PCOs increased from 34 to 41%, the mean CRC screening rate for Hispanic patients did not increase from 30%. In contrast, the mean overall CRC screening rate at the CoachIQ PCOs increased from 41 to 44%, and the mean CRC screening rate for Hispanic patients increased from 35 to 39%.
The CoachIQ program merges two implementation science methodologies, practice facilitation and causal pathway diagrams, to help PCOs focus quality improvement efforts on improving CRC screening while also reducing screening disparities. Results from this pilot study demonstrate key differences between CoachIQ facilitation and standard facilitation, and point to the potential of the CoachIQ approach to decrease disparities in CRC screening.
在美国,结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症死亡的第二大主要原因,也是西班牙裔人群中第二常见的癌症诊断。然而,西班牙裔成年人的 CRC 筛查率仍低于非西班牙裔白人成年人。为了减少 CRC 筛查差距,必须考虑在初级保健组织(PCO)中实施 CRC 筛查循证干预措施对现有筛查差距的潜在影响。需要更多的研究来了解如何利用现有的实施科学方法来改善健康差距。“提高结直肠癌筛查公平性的辅导(CoachIQ)”试点研究探讨了整合两种实施科学工具,因果路径图和实践促进,是否是解决西班牙裔患者 CRC 筛查差距的可行且有效的方法。
我们采用准实验、混合方法设计来评估 CoachIQ 方法的可行性,并评估其初步效果信号。三个 PCO 在 12 个月的时间内接受了 CoachIQ 实践促进者的辅导。在与参与者相同的时间内,三个非等效的比较组 PCO 接受了来自州质量改进计划的辅导。我们对筛查率和辅导活动进行了描述性分析。
与比较组的实践促进者相比,CoachIQ 实践促进者在更高比例的辅导会议中讨论公平性、促进质量改进活动的优先级,并审查 CRC 筛查差距。虽然比较组中 PCO 的总体 CRC 筛查率从 34%增加到 41%,但西班牙裔患者的 CRC 筛查率并未从 30%增加。相比之下,在 CoachIQ PCO 中,总体 CRC 筛查率从 41%增加到 44%,西班牙裔患者的 CRC 筛查率从 35%增加到 39%。
CoachIQ 项目结合了两种实施科学方法,即实践促进和因果路径图,以帮助 PCO 集中精力改善 CRC 筛查质量,同时减少筛查差距。这项试点研究的结果表明了 CoachIQ 促进与标准促进之间的关键差异,并指出了 CoachIQ 方法在减少 CRC 筛查差距方面的潜力。