Suppr超能文献

患者自评主观全面评定法与传统人体测量法:老年癌症患者营养不良检测方法的比较

Patient-generated subjective global assessment and classic anthropometry: comparison between the methods in detection of malnutrition among elderly with cancer.

作者信息

Araújo dos Santos Carolina, de Oliveira Barbosa Rosa Carla, Queiroz Ribeiro Andréia, Lanes Ribeiro Rita de Cássia

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Health. Federal University of Viçosa. Brazil..

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 2015 Jan 1;31(1):384-92. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.1.7543.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A comparative study of the various methods of nutritional assessment currently available in oncology are necessary to identify the most appropriate one, as well as the relationships that exist among the different instruments.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the nutritional diagnosis obtained by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) with the objective anthropometric measurements in the elderly undergoing oncology treatment and to assess the concordance between the methods used in detecting malnutrition.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of the elderly, older than or equal to 60 years in age undergoing oncology treatment. The PG-SGA was performed and the anthropometric parameters including weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), arm circumference, arm muscle circumference, corrected arm muscle area, arm fat area, calf circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio and triceps skinfold were evaluated. From a 24-hour recall the energy and macronutrient intakes were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 96 elderly patients were evaluated. The PG-SGA identified 29.2% with moderate malnutrition or suspected malnutrition and 14.6% with severe malnutrition. From among the elderly evaluated, 47.9% required critical nutritional intervention. The anthropometric parameters and the consumption of energy and macronutrients revealed significant differences based on the subjective PG-SGA classification. The prevalence of malnutrition ranged from 43.8% to 61.4%, depending upon the instrument used. The method most consistent with the diagnosis of malnutrition provided by the PGSGA was the BMI (kappa = 0.54; CI: 0.347-0.648).

CONCLUSIONS

The PG-SGA showed a significant correlation with the anthropometric measurements and with food consumption for both the categorical classification, as well as for the scoring system. Diagnosis of malnutrition showed variable prevalence depending upon the method used, and none were found equivalent to the PG-SGA.

摘要

引言

对肿瘤学中目前可用的各种营养评估方法进行比较研究,对于确定最合适的方法以及不同工具之间存在的关系是必要的。

目的

比较患者主观整体评定法(PG-SGA)得出的营养诊断结果与接受肿瘤治疗的老年人的客观人体测量指标,并评估用于检测营养不良的方法之间的一致性。

方法

对年龄大于或等于60岁且正在接受肿瘤治疗的老年人进行横断面研究。进行PG-SGA评估,并评估人体测量参数,包括体重、身高、体重指数(BMI)、上臂围、上臂肌肉围、校正后的上臂肌肉面积、上臂脂肪面积、小腿围、腰围、臀围、腰臀比和三头肌皮褶厚度。通过24小时回顾法估算能量和宏量营养素摄入量。

结果

共评估了96名老年患者。PG-SGA确定29.2%的患者为中度营养不良或疑似营养不良,14.6%的患者为重度营养不良。在接受评估的老年人中,47.9%需要进行关键的营养干预。基于主观的PG-SGA分类,人体测量参数以及能量和宏量营养素的摄入量显示出显著差异。根据所使用的工具,营养不良的患病率在43.8%至61.4%之间。与PG-SGA提供的营养不良诊断最一致的方法是BMI(kappa = 0.54;CI:0.347 - 0.648)。

结论

PG-SGA在分类和评分系统方面,与人体测量指标以及食物摄入量均显示出显著相关性。营养不良的诊断患病率因所使用的方法而异,且未发现有与PG-SGA等效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验