Gharehbaghian Ahmad, Salimian Morteza, Taherian Ali Akbar, Elahi Asghar, Khamechian Tahereh, Karimi Gharib, Ghasemzadeh Mehran
Hematology and Blood Banking Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ; Pediatric Congenital Hematologic Disorders Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Blood Transfusion Research Centre, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran. ; Platelet Research Laboratory, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Iran J Pharm Res. 2015 Winter;14(1):321-8.
Intraplatelet vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) analysis is a commonly used laboratory approach for monitoring of the anti-platelet therapy with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blocking agents; however, it's testing in clinical laboratory needs a high level of experience and proficiency. The ability to recognize how the pre-analytical variations can change the results would be helpful for the interpretation of data from intraplatelet VASP analysis. The aim of this study was to describe the possible differences of intraplatelet phospho-VASP expression between washed and platelet rich plasma (PRP) samples, both at baseline levels and following experimentally induction of VASP phosphorylation. PRP and washed platelet samples were treated with different inducers of VASP phosphorylation, including forskolin (10 µM), prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (50 nM) and sodium nitro-prusside (SNP) (100 µM). Untreated PRP and washed platelet samples were also included in study as baseline controls. After labeling of platelets with either anti P-Serine(157)-VASP or anti P-Serine(239)-VASP, the samples were subjected to flow cytometric analysis to monitor the levels of intraplatelet phospho-VASP expression. Washed platelet samples tend to show increased expression of intraplatelet P-Serine(157)-VASP at baseline state and also more expression of P-Serine(157)-VASP and P-Serine(239)-VASP in response to forskolin and SNP, compared with PRP samples. Though, reduced levels of PGE1-induced VASP phosphorylation at both residues were detected for washed platelets. In this study we have provided some background information required for performing of intraplatelet VASP analysis on differently handled platelet samples and interpretation of the obtained results.
血小板内血管舒张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)分析是一种常用的实验室方法,用于监测二磷酸腺苷(ADP)受体阻断剂的抗血小板治疗;然而,其在临床实验室中的检测需要高水平的经验和熟练度。认识到分析前的变异如何改变结果的能力,将有助于解释血小板内VASP分析的数据。本研究的目的是描述在基线水平以及实验诱导VASP磷酸化后,洗涤血小板样本和富血小板血浆(PRP)样本之间血小板内磷酸化VASP表达的可能差异。PRP和洗涤血小板样本用不同的VASP磷酸化诱导剂处理,包括福斯高林(10 μM)、前列腺素E1(PGE1)(50 nM)和硝普钠(SNP)(100 μM)。未处理的PRP和洗涤血小板样本也作为基线对照纳入研究。在用抗丝氨酸(157)-VASP或抗丝氨酸(239)-VASP标记血小板后,对样本进行流式细胞术分析,以监测血小板内磷酸化VASP表达水平。与PRP样本相比,洗涤血小板样本在基线状态下倾向于显示血小板内丝氨酸(157)-VASP表达增加,并且在对福斯高林和SNP的反应中,丝氨酸(157)-VASP和丝氨酸(239)-VASP的表达也更多。不过,检测到洗涤血小板中两个残基处PGE1诱导的VASP磷酸化水平降低。在本研究中,我们提供了一些对不同处理的血小板样本进行血小板内VASP分析以及解释所得结果所需的背景信息。