Soltes Marek, Radoňak Jozef
1 Department of Surgery, University of Pavol Jozef Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Dec;9(4):608-12. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.47642. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
Several preoperative scoring systems have been proposed to predict the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in order to optimize the results of surgical treatment by either selection of patients for the procedure or providing an adequately experienced surgical team for a given patient. Nevertheless, none of them has achieved significant penetration into everyday practice.
To propose and validate a novel risk score based on the patient's history, physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography parameters.
The risk score was defined by the presence of the following risk factors: male sex, biliary colic within the last 3 weeks prior to surgery, history of acute cholecystitis treated conservatively, previous upper abdominal surgery, right upper quadrant pain, rigidity in right upper abdomen and ultrasonographic parameters - thickening of the gallbladder wall ≥ 4 mm, hydropic gallbladder (diameter exceeding 4.5 cm) and shrunken gallbladder. One point was allocated for each risk factor, except for previous upper abdominal surgery, which scored two. Difficulty of the surgery was assessed by operating time (OT) and the postoperative subjective evaluation score (PSES).
Five hundred and eighty-six consecutive patients were enrolled in the prospective observational study. A significant linear correlation was observed between the risk score and measures of difficulty employed. Five levels of difficulty were defined (score 0, 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4) with significant differences in OT, PSES and conversion rates (p < 0.001).
The suggested risk score is designed as a simple and reliable predictive model, possibly effective to overcome the negative effect of the individual proficiency gain curve and/or to select 'easy' cases for day surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery or natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery procedures.
已经提出了几种术前评分系统来预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术的难度,以便通过为该手术选择合适的患者或为特定患者提供经验丰富的手术团队来优化手术治疗效果。然而,它们都没有在日常实践中得到广泛应用。
基于患者的病史、体格检查和腹部超声检查参数,提出并验证一种新的风险评分。
风险评分由以下风险因素确定:男性、术前3周内的胆绞痛、保守治疗的急性胆囊炎病史、既往上腹部手术史、右上腹疼痛、右上腹僵硬以及超声检查参数——胆囊壁增厚≥4mm、胆囊积水(直径超过4.5cm)和胆囊萎缩。除既往上腹部手术评分为2分外,每个风险因素得1分。手术难度通过手术时间(OT)和术后主观评估评分(PSES)进行评估。
586例连续患者纳入前瞻性观察研究。观察到风险评分与所采用的难度测量指标之间存在显著的线性相关性。定义了五个难度级别(评分0、1、2、3、≥4),OT、PSES和转化率存在显著差异(p<0.001)。
所建议的风险评分被设计为一种简单可靠的预测模型,可能有效地克服个体熟练度增长曲线的负面影响和/或为日间手术、单切口腹腔镜手术或经自然腔道内镜手术选择“简单”病例。