• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prognostic subgroups for remission and response in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial.在协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)试验中缓解和反应的预后亚组。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;76(3):267-78. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08922.
2
Effects of co-occurring depression on treatment for anxiety disorders: analysis of outcomes from a large primary care effectiveness trial.共病抑郁对焦虑障碍治疗的影响:来自一项大型初级保健效果试验的结果分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;73(12):1509-16. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07955.
3
Delivery of evidence-based treatment for multiple anxiety disorders in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.在初级保健中提供基于证据的多种焦虑障碍治疗:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1921-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.608.
4
Incremental benefits and cost of coordinated anxiety learning and management for anxiety treatment in primary care.在初级保健中,协同焦虑学习和管理对焦虑治疗的增量效益和成本。
Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1937-48. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002893. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
5
Perceived social support mediates anxiety and depressive symptom changes following primary care intervention.感知到的社会支持在初级保健干预后介导焦虑和抑郁症状的变化。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 May;31(5):436-42. doi: 10.1002/da.22216. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
6
Disorder-specific impact of coordinated anxiety learning and management treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care.初级保健中焦虑症的协同焦虑学习与管理治疗的特定疾病影响
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):378-88. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.25.
7
Predictors of anxiety recurrence in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial.“协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)试验中焦虑复发的预测因素”
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jun;65:154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
8
Quality of and patient satisfaction with primary health care for anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍初级保健的质量和患者满意度。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):970-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05626blu. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
9
Prognostic subgroups for citalopram response in the STAR*D trial.STAR*D 试验中西酞普兰反应的预后亚组。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;75(7):738-47. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08727.
10
Improving outcomes for patients with medication-resistant anxiety: effects of collaborative care with cognitive behavioral therapy.改善难治性焦虑症患者的治疗效果:认知行为疗法协作护理的作用
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Dec;33(12):1099-1106. doi: 10.1002/da.22574. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Symptom Reduction and Remission Among People with Anxiety: Secondary Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial.焦虑人群症状减轻和缓解的预测因素:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Psychiatr Q. 2024 Sep;95(3):447-467. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10081-y. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Feasibility of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Panic Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder in Japan: Pilot Single-Arm Trial.日本针对惊恐障碍和社交焦虑障碍的基于互联网的指导性认知行为疗法的可行性:单臂试验试点
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 29;8:e53659. doi: 10.2196/53659.
3
The association between social class and the impact of treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.社会阶层与心理健康问题治疗效果之间的关联:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;58(4):581-603. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02378-9. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Neural Circuits Underlying Social Fear in Rodents: An Integrative Computational Model.啮齿动物社交恐惧背后的神经回路:一种综合计算模型
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 8;16:841085. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.841085. eCollection 2022.
5
Digital and Mobile Health Technology in Collaborative Behavioral Health Care: Scoping Review.协作行为医疗保健中的数字与移动健康技术:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Feb 16;9(2):e30810. doi: 10.2196/30810.
6
Ketamine Effects on EEG during Therapy of Treatment-Resistant Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety.氯胺酮对治疗抵抗性广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑症治疗期间 EEG 的影响。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Aug 1;21(8):717-724. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy032.
7
Monotherapy Insufficient in Severe Anxiety? Predictors and Moderators in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study.单一疗法在重度焦虑中是否不足够?儿童/青少年焦虑多模式研究的预测因素和调节因素。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Mar-Apr;47(2):266-281. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1371028. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Ketamine for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.氯胺酮治疗社交焦虑障碍的随机、安慰剂对照交叉试验。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jan;43(2):325-333. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.194. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Support Vector Machine Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Interoception Does Not Reliably Predict Individual Outcomes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia.对伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍患者进行的内感受性功能性磁共振成像的支持向量机分析,不能可靠地预测认知行为疗法的个体治疗结果。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 9;8:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00099. eCollection 2017.
10
Anxiety Disorder-Specific Predictors of Treatment Outcome in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) Trial.在协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)试验中特定焦虑症的治疗结果预测因素
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Sep;87(3):445-64. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9399-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of lifecourse socioeconomic status with chronic inflammation and type 2 diabetes risk: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.毕生社会经济地位与慢性炎症和 2 型糖尿病风险的关联:白厅 II 前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001479. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
2
Effects of co-occurring depression on treatment for anxiety disorders: analysis of outcomes from a large primary care effectiveness trial.共病抑郁对焦虑障碍治疗的影响:来自一项大型初级保健效果试验的结果分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;73(12):1509-16. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07955.
3
Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States.美国焦虑和心境障碍的 12 个月和终生患病率以及终生患病风险。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):169-84. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1359. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
4
Moderators and non-specific predictors of treatment outcome for anxiety disorders: a comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy.焦虑障碍治疗结果的调节因素和非特异性预测因素:认知行为疗法与接纳与承诺疗法的比较。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):786-99. doi: 10.1037/a0029418. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
5
Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).抑郁和焦虑障碍的两年病程:来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Sep;133(1-2):76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
6
Disorder-specific impact of coordinated anxiety learning and management treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care.初级保健中焦虑症的协同焦虑学习与管理治疗的特定疾病影响
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):378-88. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.25.
7
Epidemiology of anxiety disorders.焦虑症的流行病学
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;2:21-35.
8
A meta-analysis of the influence of comorbidity on treatment outcome in the anxiety disorders.共病对焦虑障碍治疗结局影响的 Meta 分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):642-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 9.
9
Delivery of evidence-based treatment for multiple anxiety disorders in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.在初级保健中提供基于证据的多种焦虑障碍治疗:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1921-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.608.
10
Diagnostic comorbidity in adults with generalized anxiety disorder: impact of comorbidity on psychotherapy outcome and impact of psychotherapy on comorbid diagnoses.成人广泛性焦虑障碍中的诊断共病:共病对心理治疗结局的影响,以及心理治疗对共病诊断的影响。
Behav Ther. 2010 Mar;41(1):59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

在协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)试验中缓解和反应的预后亚组。

Prognostic subgroups for remission and response in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial.

作者信息

Kelly J MacLaren, Jakubovski Ewgeni, Bloch Michael H

机构信息

Yale OCD Research Clinic and Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;76(3):267-78. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08922.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.13m08922
PMID:25562579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4930076/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with anxiety disorders receive treatment in primary care settings. Limited moderator data are available to inform clinicians of likely prognostic outcomes for individual patients. We identify baseline characteristics associated with outcome in adults seeking treatment for anxiety disorders.

METHOD

We conducted an exploratory moderator analysis from the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial. In the CALM trial, 1,004 adults who met DSM-IV criteria for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were randomized to usual care (UC) or a collaborative care intervention (ITV) of cognitive-behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy between June 2006 and April 2008. Logistic regression was used to examine baseline characteristics associated with remission and response overall and by treatment condition. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses identified subgroups associated with similar likelihood of response and remission of global anxiety symptoms. Remission was defined as score < 6 on the 12-item Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-12) anxiety and somatization subscales. Response was defined as at least 50% reduction on BSI-12, or meeting remission criteria.

RESULTS

Randomization to ITV over UC was often the strongest predictor of outcome. Several baseline patient characteristics were associated with poor treatment outcome including comorbid depression, increased severity of underlying anxiety disorder(s) (P < .001), low socioeconomic status (perceived [P < .001] and actual [P < .05]), and limited social support (P < .001). Patient characteristics associated with particular benefit from ITV were being female (P < .05), increased depression (P < .01)/GAD severity (P < .05), and low socioeconomic status (P < .05). ROC analysis demonstrated prognostic subgroups with large differences in response likelihood.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research should focus on the effectiveness of implementing the ITV intervention of CALM in community treatment centers where patients typically are of low socioeconomic status and may particularly benefit from ITV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00347269.

摘要

目的

大多数焦虑症患者在初级保健机构接受治疗。目前可用于指导临床医生了解个体患者可能预后结果的调节因素数据有限。我们确定了寻求焦虑症治疗的成年人中与治疗结果相关的基线特征。

方法

我们对协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)试验进行了探索性调节因素分析。在CALM试验中,1004名符合DSM-IV广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)、惊恐障碍、社交焦虑障碍和/或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)标准的成年人在2006年6月至2008年4月期间被随机分配到常规护理(UC)或认知行为疗法和/或药物治疗的协作护理干预(ITV)组。采用逻辑回归分析来检查总体上以及按治疗条件与缓解和反应相关的基线特征。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定了与全球焦虑症状缓解和反应可能性相似的亚组。缓解定义为12项简明症状量表(BSI-12)焦虑和躯体化分量表得分<6。反应定义为BSI-12至少降低50%,或符合缓解标准。

结果

随机分配到ITV组而非UC组通常是治疗结果的最强预测因素。几个基线患者特征与不良治疗结果相关,包括共病抑郁、潜在焦虑症严重程度增加(P<.001)、社会经济地位低(感知的[P<.001]和实际的[P<.05])以及社会支持有限(P<.001)。从ITV中特别受益的患者特征为女性(P<.05)、抑郁增加(P<.01)/GAD严重程度增加(P<.05)以及社会经济地位低(P<.05)。ROC分析显示了反应可能性差异很大的预后亚组。

结论

进一步的研究应聚焦于在社区治疗中心实施CALM的ITV干预的有效性,这些中心的患者通常社会经济地位较低,可能特别受益于ITV。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00347269。