Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;58(4):581-603. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02378-9. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
This systematic review aimed to synthesise all quantitative literature on the association between social class and the effectiveness of interventions for mental health disorders.
Systematic literature searches (inception-March 2021) were conducted across 7 databases, and all quantitative studies meeting inclusion criteria, examining the impact of social class on access to treatment, or intervention effectiveness, or the impact of treatment on social mobility, were synthesised narratively.
Evidence suggests that lower social class may be associated with reduced access to primary and secondary mental health care and increased likelihood of access via crisis services, and patients of lower social class may not benefit from all mental health interventions, with reduced effectiveness. While limited, there was some indication that psychosocial interventions could encourage increased employment rates.
Social class is associated with the effectiveness of psychological interventions, and should be considered when designing new interventions to prevent barriers to access and improve effectiveness.
本系统评价旨在综合所有关于社会阶层与心理健康障碍干预效果之间关联的定量文献。
对 7 个数据库进行了系统的文献检索(从开始到 2021 年 3 月),并综合了所有符合纳入标准的定量研究,这些研究考察了社会阶层对治疗机会的影响,或干预效果,或治疗对社会流动的影响。
有证据表明,较低的社会阶层可能与获得初级和二级精神卫生保健的机会减少有关,而通过危机服务获得治疗的可能性增加,社会阶层较低的患者可能无法从所有心理健康干预中获益,治疗效果降低。虽然有限,但有一些迹象表明,心理社会干预可以鼓励更高的就业率。
社会阶层与心理干预的效果有关,在设计新的干预措施以预防获得治疗的障碍和提高效果时,应考虑这一因素。