抑郁和焦虑障碍的两年病程:来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的结果。
Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry/EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research/Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
J Affect Disord. 2011 Sep;133(1-2):76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
BACKGROUND
Whether course trajectories of depressive and anxiety disorders are different, remains an important question for clinical practice and informs future psychiatric nosology. This longitudinal study compares depressive and anxiety disorders in terms of diagnostic and symptom course trajectories, and examines clinical prognostic factors.
METHODS
Data are from 1209 depressive and/or anxiety patients residing in primary and specialized care settings, participating in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Diagnostic and Life Chart Interviews provided 2-year course information.
RESULTS
Course was more favorable for pure depression (n=267, median episode duration = 6 months, 24.5% chronic) than for pure anxiety (n=487, median duration = 16 months, 41.9% chronic). Worst course was observed in the comorbid depression-anxiety group (n=455, median duration > 24 months, 56.8% chronic). Independent predictors of poor diagnostic and symptom trajectory outcomes were severity and duration of index episode, comorbid depression-anxiety, earlier onset age and older age. With only these factors a reasonable discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.72-0.77) was reached in predicting 2-year prognosis.
LIMITATION
Depression and anxiety cases concern prevalent - not incident - cases. This, however, reflects the actual patient population in primary and specialized care settings.
CONCLUSIONS
Their differential course trajectory justifies separate consideration of pure depression, pure anxiety and comorbid anxiety-depression in clinical practice and psychiatric nosology.
背景
抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍的病程轨迹是否不同,这对临床实践仍然是一个重要的问题,并为未来的精神疾病分类学提供信息。本纵向研究比较了抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍在诊断和症状病程轨迹方面的差异,并探讨了临床预后因素。
方法
数据来自于居住在初级和专科医疗保健机构的 1209 例抑郁和/或焦虑患者,他们参与了荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究。使用诊断和生活图表访谈提供了 2 年的病程信息。
结果
纯抑郁(n=267,中位数发作持续时间=6 个月,24.5%慢性)的病程比纯焦虑(n=487,中位数持续时间=16 个月,41.9%慢性)更有利。在共病抑郁-焦虑组(n=455,中位数持续时间>24 个月,56.8%慢性)观察到最差的病程。诊断和症状轨迹不良结局的独立预测因素是指数发作的严重程度和持续时间、共病抑郁-焦虑、发病年龄较早和年龄较大。仅这些因素就可以达到合理的判别能力(C 统计量为 0.72-0.77),预测 2 年预后。
局限性
抑郁和焦虑病例涉及的是现患病例,而不是新发病例。然而,这反映了初级和专科医疗保健机构中实际的患者人群。
结论
它们不同的病程轨迹证明在临床实践和精神疾病分类学中需要分别考虑单纯抑郁、单纯焦虑和共病焦虑-抑郁。