Suppr超能文献

作为体育活动和教育干预的体育活动课程:方法与结果的系统评价

Physically active lessons as physical activity and educational interventions: a systematic review of methods and results.

作者信息

Norris E, Shelton N, Dunsmuir S, Duke-Williams O, Stamatakis E

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Jan 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physically active lessons aim to increase children's physical activity whilst maintaining academic time. This systematic review aimed to investigate the methods used in such interventions and their effects on physical activity and educational outcomes.

METHODS

In March 2014; PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and ERIC electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were: 1. Classroom lessons containing both PA and educational elements; 2. intervention studies featuring a control group or within-subjects baseline measurement period; 3. any age-group; and 4. English language. Studies assessing physically active lessons within complex interventions were excluded. Data were extracted onto a standardised form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified: five examined physical activity outcomes only, three examined educational outcomes only and three examined both physical activity and educational outcomes. All studies found improved physical activity following physically active lessons: either in the whole intervention group or in specific demographics. Educational outcomes either significantly improved or were no different compared to inactive teaching. Studies ranged from low to high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Encouraging evidence of improved physical activity and educational outcomes following physically active lessons is provided. However, too few studies exist to draw firm conclusions. Future high-quality studies with longer intervention periods are warranted.

摘要

目的

体育活动课程旨在增加儿童的身体活动量,同时保证学习时间。本系统评价旨在调查此类干预措施所采用的方法及其对身体活动和教育成果的影响。

方法

2014年3月,检索了PubMed、科学网、PsycINFO和教育资源信息中心(ERIC)电子数据库。纳入标准为:1. 包含体育活动和教育元素的课堂教学;2. 有对照组或受试者内基线测量期的干预研究;3. 任何年龄组;4. 英文文献。排除在复杂干预措施中评估体育活动课程的研究。数据提取到标准化表格上。使用有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入11项研究:5项仅考察了身体活动结果,3项仅考察了教育成果,3项同时考察了身体活动和教育成果。所有研究均发现,体育活动课程后身体活动有所改善:无论是在整个干预组还是在特定人群中。与非体育教学相比,教育成果要么显著改善,要么没有差异。研究的偏倚风险从低到高不等。

结论

有证据表明体育活动课程后身体活动和教育成果得到改善,令人鼓舞。然而,现有研究数量过少,无法得出确凿结论。未来需要开展高质量、干预期更长的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验