• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活学习空间、课间活动及主动式课程对学龄儿童久坐行为、身体活动、学习及肌肉骨骼健康的影响:一项范围综述

Effects of flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons on sedentary behaviors, physical activity, learning, and musculoskeletal health in school-aged children: a scoping review.

作者信息

Larose David, Massie Carole-Lynn, St-Aubin Alix, Boulay-Pelletier Valérie, Boulanger Elyse, Lavoie Marie Denise, Yessis Jennifer, Tremblay Angelo, Drapeau Vicky

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Quebec Heart and Lung Institute Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Dec 2;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00068-2.

DOI:10.1186/s44167-024-00068-2
PMID:40217446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children aged 6 to 17 spend long periods of sitting at school. Reducing these behaviors and increasing physical activity has been linked to improvements in cognitive functions and decreased musculoskeletal issues. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe interventions implementing flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons and their effects on sedentary behaviors as well as on physical activity, learning, and musculoskeletal health.

METHODS

A search on databases (EDUCATION SOURCE, ERIC, SPORTDISCUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and WEB OF SCIENCE) was carried out in April 2021 and updated in June 2022 according to the guidelines of the "PRISMA-ScR". Studies on flexible learning spaces and physical activity in elementary and secondary school classes were retained. These also had to measure the effects of the interventions on sedentary behaviors, physical activity, learning (e.g., academic achievement), and musculoskeletal health outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-two articles were identified; twenty-four from the initial screening, thirty-two from the update, and thirty-six were manually included. Among these 92 articles, twenty-one studies used only flexible learning spaces, twenty-three used only active breaks, thirty-six used only active lessons, four used both flexible learning spaces and active breaks separately in different classes, five combined active breaks and active lessons, and three combined flexible learning spaces and active breaks. Analyses show positive changes in sedentary behaviors (32 articles/40) and physical activity (52 articles/74) including sitting time, sit-to-stand transitions, number of steps, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Positive effects were also observed on learning (13 articles/26) or musculoskeletal health outcomes (3 articles/8). Although many studies found no effect of these interventions, no studies report harmful interventions on these variables. The most effective strategy to reduce sedentary behaviors seems to be flexible learning spaces with adapted teaching approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons effectively reduce sedentary behaviors and increase physical activity without negatively influencing academic achievement. Further studies are needed to understand better the effects of combining these interventions and their effects on children's learning and musculoskeletal health outcomes.

摘要

背景

6至17岁的儿童在学校长时间坐着。减少这些行为并增加身体活动与认知功能的改善以及肌肉骨骼问题的减少有关。本范围综述的目的是描述实施灵活学习空间、课间活动和动态课程的干预措施及其对久坐行为、身体活动、学习和肌肉骨骼健康的影响。

方法

2021年4月在数据库(教育源数据库、教育资源信息中心数据库、体育数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库和科学引文索引数据库)中进行了检索,并根据“PRISMA-ScR”指南于2022年6月进行了更新。纳入了关于中小学课堂中灵活学习空间和身体活动的研究。这些研究还必须测量干预措施对久坐行为、身体活动、学习(如学业成绩)和肌肉骨骼健康结果的影响。

结果

共识别出92篇文章;初始筛选出24篇,更新筛选出32篇,另有36篇通过人工筛选纳入。在这92篇文章中,21项研究仅使用了灵活学习空间,23项仅使用了课间活动,36项仅使用了动态课程,4项在不同班级分别使用了灵活学习空间和课间活动,5项将课间活动和动态课程相结合,3项将灵活学习空间和课间活动相结合。分析表明,久坐行为(32篇文章/40项研究)和身体活动(52篇文章/74项研究)出现了积极变化,包括久坐时间、坐立转换次数、步数以及中等到剧烈的身体活动。在学习(13篇文章/26项研究)或肌肉骨骼健康结果(3篇文章/8项研究)方面也观察到了积极影响。尽管许多研究发现这些干预措施没有效果,但没有研究报告这些干预措施对这些变量有有害影响。减少久坐行为最有效的策略似乎是采用灵活学习空间并结合适应性教学方法。

结论

结果表明,灵活学习空间、课间活动和动态课程能有效减少久坐行为并增加身体活动,且不会对学业成绩产生负面影响。需要进一步研究以更好地了解这些干预措施相结合的效果及其对儿童学习和肌肉骨骼健康结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/11960325/8d3b19c92580/44167_2024_68_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/11960325/a437b61fa0ec/44167_2024_68_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/11960325/8d3b19c92580/44167_2024_68_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/11960325/a437b61fa0ec/44167_2024_68_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/11960325/8d3b19c92580/44167_2024_68_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons on sedentary behaviors, physical activity, learning, and musculoskeletal health in school-aged children: a scoping review.灵活学习空间、课间活动及主动式课程对学龄儿童久坐行为、身体活动、学习及肌肉骨骼健康的影响:一项范围综述
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Dec 2;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00068-2.
2
Physical Activity, Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Academic Achievement in Children: A Systematic Review.儿童的身体活动、健康状况、认知功能与学业成绩:一项系统综述
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1197-222. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901.
3
Comparison of Classroom-Based Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Conventional Classrooms and Open Learning Spaces Among Elementary School Students.小学生在传统教室和开放式学习空间中基于课堂的久坐时间与身体活动的比较。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jun 15;3:626282. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.626282. eCollection 2021.
4
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
5
Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents.改善超重或肥胖儿童及青少年学业成绩的生活方式干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14(3):CD009728. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009728.pub2.
6
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub5.
7
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4.
8
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.针对久坐工作者增加站立或行走以减轻肌肉骨骼症状的工作场所干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 17;2019(11):CD012487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012487.pub2.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于课堂的体育活动干预对学业和体育活动结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedentary behavior and neck pain in children and adolescents; a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年的久坐行为与颈部疼痛;一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Promot Perspect. 2022 Dec 10;12(3):240-248. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.31. eCollection 2022.
2
Two-Year Effectiveness of a Controlled Trial With Physically Active Lessons on Behavioral Indicators of School Children.一项关于体育活动课程对学童行为指标影响的对照试验的两年有效性
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Jun;94(2):538-546. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.2020707. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Does Learning Through Movement Improve Academic Performance in Primary Schoolchildren? A Systematic Review.
通过运动学习能否提高小学生的学业成绩?一项系统综述。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 8;10:841582. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.841582. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Active Breaks in the Classroom on Mathematical Performance and Attention in Elementary School Children.课堂上的主动休息对小学生数学成绩和注意力的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;9(12):1689. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121689.
5
Physical Activity through a Classroom-Based Intervention: A Pragmatic Non-Randomized Trial among Swedish Adolescents in an Upper Secondary School.基于课堂的干预措施促进身体活动:瑞典一所高中青少年的实用非随机试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11041. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111041.
6
Comparison of Classroom-Based Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Conventional Classrooms and Open Learning Spaces Among Elementary School Students.小学生在传统教室和开放式学习空间中基于课堂的久坐时间与身体活动的比较。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jun 15;3:626282. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.626282. eCollection 2021.
7
Effectiveness of the POWER Program in Improving Physical Activity and Executive Function in Fifth Grade Students.POWER项目对提高五年级学生身体活动能力和执行功能的有效性。
J Sch Health. 2021 Jul;91(7):574-583. doi: 10.1111/josh.13035. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
The impact of physically active learning during the school day on children's physical activity levels, time on task and learning behaviours and academic outcomes.在学校日中进行积极的体育学习对儿童的身体活动水平、任务时间、学习行为和学业成绩的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2021 Jul 12;36(3):362-373. doi: 10.1093/her/cyab020.
9
Stand Out in Class: Investigating the Potential Impact of a Sit-Stand Desk Intervention on Children's Sitting and Physical Activity during Class Time and after School.在课堂上和课后使用站坐两用办公桌对儿童坐姿和身体活动的潜在影响研究:让学生脱颖而出
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;18(9):4759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094759.
10
The Fueling Learning Through Exercise Study Cluster RCT: Impact on Children's Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity.通过运动促进学习的研究群组 RCT:对儿童中等到剧烈身体活动的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):e239-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Mar 26.