Department of General Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105576. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105576. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
Self-control plays an essential role in children's emotional and behavioral adjustment. A central behavioral indicator of self-control is the ability to delay gratification. Few studies have focused on understanding the heterogeneity of self-control behaviors that underlie children's ability to delay gratification. Therefore, we examined the role of spontaneous self-control behaviors (fidgeting, vocalizations, and anticipation/attentional focus toward a reward) in relation to 5-year old children's delay ability using Mischel's delay task (N = 144; M = 5.4 years, SD = 0.29). Latent mixture modeling was used to derive three distinct classes of self-control behaviors observed during the delay task: (1) Passive (low fidgeting, low vocalizations, but moderate anticipation), (2) Active (moderate fidgeting, moderate vocalizations, but high anticipation), and (3) Disruptive (high fidgeting, high vocalizations, and high anticipation). Children in the Passive class were more likely to delay the full task time compared with children in the Active class (odds ratio = 1.50, 95 % confidence interval = 1.28-1.81). There were no other differences in delay ability by self-control class. Children whose level of fidgeting and vocalizations matched their level of anticipation (i.e., Passive and Disruptive regulators) were able to delay more successfully than children who were mostly driven by anticipation (Active regulators). Some variation in children's delay ability and use of self-control strategies was explained by sociodemographic differences, specifically maternal age. Findings suggest probing processes underlying children's self-control to identify potential targets for intervention.
自我控制在儿童的情绪和行为调节中起着至关重要的作用。自我控制的一个核心行为指标是延迟满足的能力。很少有研究关注理解儿童延迟满足能力背后的自我控制行为的异质性。因此,我们使用米歇尔的延迟任务(N=144;M=5.4 岁,SD=0.29),考察了自发自我控制行为(坐立不安、发声和对奖励的预期/注意力集中)与 5 岁儿童延迟能力的关系。潜在混合模型用于从延迟任务中观察到的三种不同类型的自我控制行为中得出结论:(1)被动(低坐立不安,低发声,但适度预期),(2)主动(中度坐立不安,中度发声,但高度预期)和(3)干扰(高度坐立不安,高发声,高预期)。与主动类儿童相比,被动类儿童更有可能延迟完成整个任务时间(优势比=1.50,95%置信区间=1.28-1.81)。自我控制类别之间在延迟能力方面没有其他差异。坐立不安和发声水平与预期水平相匹配的儿童(即被动和干扰调节者)比主要受预期驱动的儿童(主动调节者)能够更成功地延迟(优势比=1.50,95%置信区间=1.28-1.81)。儿童延迟能力和自我控制策略的使用存在一些差异,这可以通过社会人口统计学差异来解释,特别是母亲的年龄。研究结果表明,需要深入探究儿童自我控制的背后过程,以确定潜在的干预目标。