Lei Burton Deborah, LeMay Kate S, Saini Bandana, Smith Lorraine, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia, Southwell Phillipa, Cooke Julie, Emmerton Lynne, Stewart Kay, Krass Ines, Reddel Helen, Armour Carol
a Department of Biomedical Science , Charles Sturt University , Orange , NSW , Australia .
b Woolcock Institute, the University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia .
J Asthma. 2015;52(9):913-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1004684. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
To investigate the reliability and the utility of spirometry generated by community pharmacists participating in two large asthma intervention trials of 892 people.
The Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) and the Pharmacy Asthma Management Service (PAMS) involved up to four visits to the pharmacy over 6 months for counseling and goal setting. Pharmacists performed spirometry according to ATS/ERS guidelines to inform management. The proportion of A-E, F quality tests, as per EasyOne QC grades, were recorded. Lung function results between visits and for participants referred/not referred to their general practitioner on the basis of spirometry were compared.
Complete data from 2593 spirometry sessions were recorded, 68.5% of spirometry sessions achieved three acceptable tests with between-test repeatability of 150 ml or less (A or B quality), 96% of spirometry sessions included at least one test that met ATS/ERS acceptability criteria. About 39.1% of participants had FEV1/FVC values below the lower limit of normal (LNN), indicating a respiratory obstruction. As a result of the service, there was a significant increase in FEV1 and FEV1/FVC and asthma control. Lung function values were significantly poorer for participants referred to their general practitioner, compared with those not referred, on the basis of spirometry.
Community pharmacists are able to reliably achieve spirometry results meeting ATS/ERS guidelines in people with asthma. Significant improvements in airway obstruction were demonstrated with the pharmacy services. Pharmacists interpreted lung function results to identify airway obstruction for referral, making this a useful technique for review of people with asthma in the community.
调查社区药剂师参与两项针对892人的大型哮喘干预试验所进行的肺活量测定的可靠性和实用性。
药房哮喘护理计划(PACP)和药房哮喘管理服务(PAMS)在6个月内涉及多达4次到药房进行咨询和目标设定。药剂师根据美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会指南进行肺活量测定以指导管理。记录根据EasyOne质量控制等级划分的A-E、F级质量测试的比例。比较各次就诊之间以及根据肺活量测定结果被转诊/未被转诊至全科医生的参与者的肺功能结果。
记录了来自2593次肺活量测定的完整数据,68.5%的肺活量测定获得了三次可接受的测试,测试间重复性为150毫升或更低(A或B级质量),96%的肺活量测定至少包括一次符合美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会可接受标准的测试。约39.1%的参与者FEV1/FVC值低于正常下限(LNN),表明存在呼吸阻塞。由于该服务,FEV1和FEV1/FVC以及哮喘控制情况有显著改善。根据肺活量测定结果,被转诊至全科医生的参与者的肺功能值明显低于未被转诊者。
社区药剂师能够在哮喘患者中可靠地获得符合美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会指南的肺活量测定结果。药房服务显示气道阻塞有显著改善。药剂师解读肺功能结果以识别气道阻塞以便转诊,这使其成为社区中哮喘患者复查的一项有用技术。