Suppr超能文献

在结直肠癌肝转移有效新辅助化疗时代,方氏评分和诺德林格评分的临床相关性。

The clinical relevance of the Fong and the Nordlinger scores in the era of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis.

作者信息

Schreckenbach Teresa, Malkomes Patrizia, Bechstein Wolf O, Woeste Guido, Schnitzbauer Andreas A, Ulrich Frank

机构信息

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2015 Dec;45(12):1527-34. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1108-9. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The clinical risk scores (CRSs) of Fong and Nordlinger are used to predict the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study investigated whether CRSs could predict the overall survival of patients with CRLM treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection.

METHODS

Patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was overall survival with vs. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between August 2002 and October 2011, 300 patients underwent liver resection for CRLMs at a large university hospital in Germany. Group A comprised 117 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and group B comprised 71 patients who did not. The Fong score predicted overall survival for patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.02), but not for those treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.69). The Nordlinger score was not predictive for either of the groups (p = 0.71 vs. p = 0.08 for groups A and B, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the Nordlinger score identified better overall survival in the high-risk group treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a resection margin of <1 cm [OR 0.622 (95% CI: 0.17-2.31); p = 0.044], age >60 years [OR 0.535 (95% CI: 0.16-1.77); p = 0.022] and number of metastases >4 [OR 0.189 (95% CI: 0.06-0.61); p = 0.018] as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Thus, CRSs were not reliable prognostic tools for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection in this analysis.

摘要

目的

方氏和诺德林格的临床风险评分(CRS)用于预测结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的预后。本研究调查了CRS能否预测在切除术前接受或未接受新辅助化疗的CRLM患者的总生存期。

方法

对接受肝切除的CRLM患者进行回顾性分析。主要结局指标是接受与未接受新辅助化疗的总生存期。

结果

2002年8月至2011年10月期间,德国一家大型大学医院有300例患者因CRLM接受了肝切除。A组包括117例接受新辅助化疗的患者,B组包括71例未接受新辅助化疗的患者。方氏评分可预测未接受化疗患者的总生存期(p = 0.02),但不能预测接受化疗患者的总生存期(p = 0.69)。诺德林格评分对两组均无预测价值(A组和B组分别为p = 0.71和p = 0.08)。诺德林格评分的亚组分析显示,接受化疗的高危组总生存期更好(p = 0.05)。多因素分析确定切缘<1 cm [比值比0.622(95%置信区间:0.17 - 2.31);p = 0.044]、年龄>60岁[比值比0.535(95%置信区间:0.16 - 1.77);p = 0.022]和转移灶数量>4 [比值比0.189(95%置信区间:0.06 - 0.61);p = 0.018]是总生存期的独立预后因素。

结论

因此,在本分析中,CRS并非肝切除术前接受新辅助化疗患者可靠的预后工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验