Chan Alexandre, Cameron Michael C, Garden Benjamin, Boers-Doets Christine B, Schindler Katja, Epstein Joel B, Choi Jennifer, Beamer Laura, Roeland Eric, Russi Elvio G, Bensadoun René-Jean, Teo Yi Ling, Chan Raymond J, Shih Vivianne, Bryce Jane, Raber-Durlacher Judith, Gerber Peter Arne, Freytes César O, Rapoport Bernardo, LeBoeuf Nicole, Sibaud Vincent, Lacouture Mario E
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2231-44. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2564-x. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) in cancer treatment are frequent with the use of targeted therapies. These dAEs have been shown to have significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While standardized assessment tools have been developed for physicians to assess severity of dAEs, there is a discord between objective and subjective measures. The identification of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments useful in the context of targeted cancer therapies is therefore important in both the clinical and research settings for the overall evaluation of dAEs and their impact on HRQoL.
A comprehensive, systematic literature search of published articles was conducted by two independent reviewers in order to identify PRO instruments previously utilized in patient populations with dAEs from targeted cancer therapies. The identified PRO instruments were studied to determine which HRQoL issues relevant to dAEs were addressed, as well as the process of development and validation of these instruments.
Thirteen articles identifying six PRO instruments met the inclusion criteria. Four instruments were general dermatology (Skindex-16©, Skindex-29©, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DIELH-24) and two were symptom-specific (functional assessment of cancer therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-18 (FACT-EGFRI-18) and hand-foot syndrome 14 (HFS-14)).
While there are several PRO instruments that have been tested in the context of targeted cancer therapy, additional work is needed to develop new instruments and to further validate the instruments identified in this study in patients receiving targeted therapies.
在癌症治疗中,使用靶向疗法时皮肤不良事件(dAEs)很常见。这些皮肤不良事件已被证明会对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)产生重大影响。虽然已经开发出标准化评估工具供医生评估皮肤不良事件的严重程度,但客观和主观测量之间存在不一致。因此,识别在靶向癌症治疗背景下有用的患者报告结局(PRO)工具,对于在临床和研究环境中全面评估皮肤不良事件及其对健康相关生活质量的影响都很重要。
两名独立评审员对已发表文章进行了全面、系统的文献检索,以识别先前在接受靶向癌症治疗且出现皮肤不良事件的患者群体中使用的PRO工具。对识别出的PRO工具进行研究,以确定其解决了哪些与皮肤不良事件相关的健康相关生活质量问题,以及这些工具的开发和验证过程。
13篇识别出6种PRO工具的文章符合纳入标准。4种工具是通用皮肤科工具(Skindex-16©、Skindex-29©、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和DIELH-24),2种是症状特异性工具(癌症治疗功能评估-表皮生长因子受体抑制剂-18(FACT-EGFRI-18)和手足综合征14(HFS-14))。
虽然有几种PRO工具已在靶向癌症治疗背景下进行了测试,但仍需要开展更多工作来开发新工具,并在接受靶向治疗的患者中进一步验证本研究中识别出的工具。