Hooper J
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jul;39(324):289-91.
It has been said that women doctors do not fulfil the same role as men doctors in general practice. This is inaccurate as previous studies of workload in general practice have not excluded from the analyses women principals who are part time, that is, have a less than full profit share at parity. In a postal questionnaire to 501 women principals 308 (62%) replied, of whom 143 (46%) were full time with respect to profit share. Respondents were asked to record aspects of workload over a four-week period for themselves and three of their full-time men partners. Analysis of their responses showed that they did an equal workload to their full-time men partners in terms of number of surgeries, length of surgeries and number of home visits. Equal numbers of full-time women did out-of-hours work as their men partners and the number of nights and weekends on-call as well as use of deputies were similar. The analysis also showed that full-time women did more specialized clinics than men, thus emphasizing the special role of women doctors in preventive care.
有人说,在全科医疗中,女医生与男医生发挥的作用不同。这种说法并不准确,因为之前有关全科医疗工作量的研究在分析时并未将兼职的女性负责人排除在外,也就是说,她们在同等条件下的利润分成不足全额。在向501名女性负责人发放的邮寄调查问卷中,有308人(62%)回复了,其中143人(46%)在利润分成方面是全职的。受访者被要求记录她们自己以及三位全职男性合伙人在四周时间内的工作量情况。对他们回复的分析表明,就诊疗次数、诊疗时长和家访次数而言,她们与全职男性合伙人的工作量相当。做非工作时间工作的全职女性人数与她们的男性合伙人一样多,随叫随到的夜间和周末次数以及副手的使用情况也相似。分析还表明,全职女性比男性做更多的专科门诊,从而凸显了女医生在预防保健方面的特殊作用。