McGrail Anne, Kelchner Lisa
Lisa Kelchner, PhD, is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
J Neurosci Nurs. 2015 Feb;47(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000114.
Substandard oral fluid intake in poststroke patients receiving thickened liquids has been well documented; however, more recently, it has been reported in poststroke patients receiving thin liquids. Factors contributing to substandard fluid intake have been limited to the altered taste/texture of thickened beverages. The aim of this study was to determine if functional deficits poststroke based on admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores for expression, problem solving, memory, and eating as well as dysphagia severity predict oral fluid intake for poststroke patients regardless of liquid viscosity. A second aim was to determine if there is a significant difference in the amount of oral fluids offered and consumed between patients receiving thin liquids and patients receiving thickened liquids.
Thirty-nine patients with a new diagnosis of ischemic stroke participated. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the consistency of liquids they were receiving: group 1, 21 receiving thin liquids, and group 2, 18 receiving nectar or honey consistency. Fluids offered and consumed were monitored for 72 consecutive hours. Admission FIM scores and dysphagia severity ratings were collected.
Functional deficits in eating significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thin-liquid group (p = .0575), whereas functional deficits in cognition (memory and problem solving) significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thickened-liquid group (p = .0037). Patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more than patients receiving thickened liquids (mean = 1,405.45 ml and SD = ±727.1 ml vs. mean = 906.58 ml and SD = ±317.4 ml; p = .0031); however, they were also offered significantly more fluids (mean = 2,574.7 ml vs. 1,588.9 ml, p = .0002).
On average, poststroke patients consume substandard amount of fluid during hospitalization, regardless of viscosity. Although patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more, they were offered, on average, approximately 1,000 ml more fluids per 24-hour period than the thickened-liquid group. Functional deficits after stroke influence oral fluid intake and should be considered as potential barriers to fluid intake for poststroke patients.
已有充分文献记载,接受增稠液体的中风后患者存在口服液体摄入量未达标准的情况;然而,最近有报道称接受稀液体的中风后患者也存在这种情况。导致液体摄入量未达标准的因素仅限于增稠饮料口感/质地的改变。本研究的目的是确定中风后基于入院时功能独立性测量(FIM)的表达、问题解决、记忆和进食评分以及吞咽困难严重程度所反映的功能缺陷,是否能预测中风后患者的口服液体摄入量,而不考虑液体粘度。第二个目的是确定接受稀液体的患者和接受增稠液体的患者在提供和摄入的口服液体量上是否存在显著差异。
39例新诊断为缺血性中风的患者参与研究。根据患者所接受液体的稠度,将其分为两组:第1组,21例接受稀液体;第2组,18例接受花蜜或蜂蜜稠度的液体。连续72小时监测提供和摄入的液体量。收集入院时的FIM评分和吞咽困难严重程度评级。
进食功能缺陷显著预测了稀液体组的口服液体摄入量(p = 0.0575),而认知功能缺陷(记忆和问题解决)显著预测了增稠液体组的口服液体摄入量(p = 0.0037)。接受稀液体的患者摄入量显著高于接受增稠液体的患者(平均值分别为1405.45毫升和标准差±727.1毫升,与平均值906.58毫升和标准差±317.4毫升相比;p = 0.0031);然而,给他们提供的液体量也显著更多(平均值分别为2574.7毫升和1588.9毫升,p = 0.0002)。
平均而言,中风后患者在住院期间的液体摄入量未达标准,与液体粘度无关。虽然接受稀液体的患者摄入量显著更多,但与增稠液体组相比,他们平均每24小时多获得约1000毫升液体。中风后的功能缺陷会影响口服液体摄入量,应被视为中风后患者液体摄入的潜在障碍。