Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Anaesthesiology Unit, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 374 Bagot Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Mar;114(3):469-76. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu410. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus is a very common side-effect that is difficult to prevent or treat. Central and peripheral mechanisms are believed to be involved. The aim of this study was to determine if a peripherally acting, μ-opioid antagonist would reduce morphine-induced pruritus.
We conducted a multicentre, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of women having elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine 100 μg. After delivery, participants received either subcutaneous methylnatrexone bromide 12 mg (MNTX group, n=69) or saline (placebo group, n=68). Pruritus, nausea, pain, analgesic use, and side-effects were assessed at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. The primary outcome was the severity of pruritus (0-10 score).
One hundred and thirty-seven women completed the study, with five major protocol violations. There was no statistically significant difference between the MNTX and placebo groups for the median (IQR) pruritus AUC scores [24 (9-47) vs 36 (11-68), median difference 8.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-20, P=0.09] or the worst pruritus score [3 (2-7) vs 5 (2-6), median difference 1, 95% CI 0-2, P=0.24]. The incidence of pruritus was 84% in the MNTX group and 88% in the placebo group (P=0.48). Analgesic and gastrointestinal outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups.
A single dose of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone bromide 12 mg did not reduce the overall severity or incidence of pruritus. In this study, treatment with a peripherally acting μ-opioid antagonist was generally ineffective against intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus, but a small clinical effect cannot be excluded.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611000345987).
鞘内注射吗啡引起的瘙痒是一种非常常见的难以预防或治疗的副作用。中枢和外周机制都被认为与之相关。本研究旨在确定一种外周作用的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂是否会减轻吗啡引起的瘙痒。
我们进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,纳入了接受椎管内麻醉下择期剖宫产的女性,鞘内注射吗啡 100μg。分娩后,参与者接受皮下注射甲基纳曲酮溴化物 12mg(MNTX 组,n=69)或生理盐水(安慰剂组,n=68)。在 2、4、8 和 24 小时评估瘙痒、恶心、疼痛、镇痛药物使用和副作用。主要结局是瘙痒严重程度(0-10 分评分)。
137 名女性完成了研究,其中 5 名出现了主要方案违规。MNTX 组和安慰剂组的瘙痒 AUC 评分中位数(IQR)[24(9-47)与 36(11-68),中位数差值 8.5,95%置信区间(CI)0-20,P=0.09]或最差瘙痒评分[3(2-7)与 5(2-6),中位数差值 1,95%CI 0-2,P=0.24]无统计学差异。MNTX 组瘙痒发生率为 84%,安慰剂组为 88%(P=0.48)。两组的镇痛和胃肠道结局无显著差异。
单次皮下注射甲基纳曲酮溴化物 12mg 并未降低瘙痒的总体严重程度或发生率。在这项研究中,使用外周作用的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂治疗对鞘内注射吗啡引起的瘙痒通常无效,但不能排除小的临床效果。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12611000345987)。