Achterberg E J Marijke, van Kerkhof Linda W M, Damsteegt Ruth, Trezza Viviana, Vanderschuren Louk J M J
Department of Animals in Science and Society, Division of Behavioural Neuroscience, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands, and.
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 7;35(1):161-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2945-14.2015.
Positive social interactions during the juvenile and adolescent phases of life, in the form of social play behavior, are important for social and cognitive development. However, the neural mechanisms of social play behavior remain incompletely understood. We have previously shown that methylphenidate and atomoxetine, drugs widely used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), suppress social play in rats through a noradrenergic mechanism of action. Here, we aimed to identify the neural substrates of the play-suppressant effects of these drugs. Methylphenidate is thought to exert its effects on cognition and emotion through limbic corticostriatal systems. Therefore, methylphenidate was infused into prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortical regions as well as into several subcortical limbic areas implicated in social play. Infusion of methylphenidate into the anterior cingulate cortex, infralimbic cortex, basolateral amygdala, and habenula inhibited social play, but not social exploratory behavior or locomotor activity. Consistent with a noradrenergic mechanism of action of methylphenidate, infusion of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine into these same regions also reduced social play. Methylphenidate administration into the prelimbic, medial/ventral orbitofrontal, and ventrolateral orbitofrontal cortex, mediodorsal thalamus, or nucleus accumbens shell was ineffective. Our data show that the inhibitory effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on social play are mediated through a distributed network of prefrontal and limbic subcortical regions implicated in cognitive control and emotional processes. These findings increase our understanding of the neural underpinnings of this developmentally important social behavior, as well as the mechanism of action of two widely used treatments for ADHD.
在青少年时期,以社交玩耍行为形式出现的积极社交互动对社交和认知发展很重要。然而,社交玩耍行为的神经机制仍未完全被理解。我们之前已经表明,哌甲酯和托莫西汀这两种广泛用于治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物,通过去甲肾上腺素能作用机制抑制大鼠的社交玩耍。在此,我们旨在确定这些药物玩耍抑制作用的神经基础。哌甲酯被认为通过边缘皮质纹状体系统对认知和情绪发挥作用。因此,将哌甲酯注入前额叶和眶额叶皮质区域以及几个与社交玩耍有关的皮质下边缘区域。将哌甲酯注入前扣带回皮质、边缘下皮质、基底外侧杏仁核和缰核会抑制社交玩耍,但不影响社交探索行为或运动活动。与哌甲酯的去甲肾上腺素能作用机制一致,将去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂托莫西汀注入这些相同区域也会减少社交玩耍。将哌甲酯注入前额叶、内侧/腹侧眶额叶和腹外侧眶额叶皮质、背内侧丘脑或伏隔核壳无效。我们的数据表明,哌甲酯和托莫西汀对社交玩耍的抑制作用是通过一个涉及认知控制和情感过程的前额叶和边缘皮质下区域的分布式网络介导的。这些发现增进了我们对这种在发育上重要的社交行为的神经基础以及两种广泛使用的ADHD治疗方法作用机制的理解。