• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于化疗坏死效果不佳且切缘阳性的骨肉瘤患者,截肢相对于保肢是否具有任何生存益处?

Does amputation offer any survival benefit over limb salvage in osteosarcoma patients with poor chemonecrosis and close margins?

作者信息

Reddy K I A, Wafa H, Gaston C L, Grimer R J, Abudu A T, Jeys L M, Carter S R, Tillman R M

机构信息

Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, 1215 21st Avenue South, Medical Center East, S Tower, Suite 4200, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8774, USA.

Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84, Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):115-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.33924.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.33924
PMID:25568424
Abstract

A poor response to chemotherapy (≤ 90% necrosis) for osteosarcomas leads to poorer survival and an increased risk of local recurrence, particularly if there is a close margin of excision. We evaluated whether amputation confers any survival benefit over limb salvage surgery (LSS) with narrow margins in patients who respond poorly to chemotherapy. We only analysed patients with an osteosarcoma of the limb, a poor response to chemotherapy and close margins on LSS (marginal/intralesional) or primary amputation: 360 patients (36 LSS (intralesional margins), 197 LSS (marginal margins) and 127 amputations) were included. Local recurrence developed in 13 (36%) following LSS with intralesional margins, and 39 (20%) following LSS with marginal margins. There was no local recurrence in patients who underwent amputation. The five-year survival for all patients was 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35 to 46), but for those treated by LSS with marginal margins was 46.2% (95% CI 38 to 53), 36.3% (95% CI 27 to 45) for those treated by amputation, and 28% (95 CI 14 to 44) for those treated by LSS with intralesional margins. Patients who had LSS and then developed local recurrence as a first event had the same survival as those who had primary amputation without local recurrence. Prophylactic adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 40 patients but had no discernible effect in preventing local recurrence. Although amputation offered better local control, it conferred no clear survival benefit over LSS with marginal margins in these patients with a poor overall prognosis.

摘要

骨肉瘤对化疗反应不佳(坏死率≤90%)会导致生存率降低和局部复发风险增加,尤其是在切除边缘较窄的情况下。我们评估了在化疗反应不佳的患者中,截肢相对于切缘狭窄的保肢手术(LSS)是否具有生存获益。我们仅分析了肢体骨肉瘤、化疗反应不佳且LSS切缘狭窄(边缘性/病损内)或一期截肢的患者:纳入了360例患者(36例LSS(病损内切缘)、197例LSS(边缘性切缘)和127例截肢)。LSS病损内切缘术后13例(36%)出现局部复发,LSS边缘性切缘术后39例(20%)出现局部复发。接受截肢的患者未出现局部复发。所有患者的五年生存率为41%(95%置信区间(CI)35%至46%),但LSS边缘性切缘治疗的患者为46.2%(95%CI 38%至53%),截肢治疗的患者为36.3%(95%CI 27%至45%),LSS病损内切缘治疗的患者为28%(95%CI 14%至44%)。LSS后首先出现局部复发的患者与未出现局部复发的一期截肢患者生存率相同。40例患者使用了预防性辅助放疗,但在预防局部复发方面没有明显效果。尽管截肢提供了更好的局部控制,但对于这些总体预后较差的患者,与LSS边缘性切缘相比,截肢并没有明显的生存获益。

相似文献

1
Does amputation offer any survival benefit over limb salvage in osteosarcoma patients with poor chemonecrosis and close margins?对于化疗坏死效果不佳且切缘阳性的骨肉瘤患者,截肢相对于保肢是否具有任何生存益处?
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):115-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.33924.
2
A Novel System for the Surgical Staging of Primary High-grade Osteosarcoma: The Birmingham Classification.一种用于原发性高级别骨肉瘤手术分期的新系统:伯明翰分类法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):842-850. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4851-y.
3
Relationship of chemotherapy-induced necrosis and surgical margins to local recurrence in osteosarcoma.骨肉瘤中化疗诱导的坏死及手术切缘与局部复发的关系
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2699-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2699.
4
Clinical Outcome and Survival of Osteosarcoma Patients in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital: Limb Salvage Surgery versus Amputation.雅加达中央医院骨肉瘤患者的临床结局与生存情况:保肢手术与截肢手术的对比
Acta Med Indones. 2016 Jul;48(3):175-183.
5
A meta-analysis comparing efficiency of limb-salvage surgery vs amputation on patients with osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.一项荟萃分析比较了新辅助化疗治疗骨肉瘤患者保肢手术与截肢的疗效。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1616-1624. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13758. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Do Surgical Margins Affect Local Recurrence and Survival in Extremity, Nonmetastatic, High-grade Osteosarcoma?手术切缘是否影响肢体非转移性高级别骨肉瘤的局部复发和生存率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Mar;474(3):677-83. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4359-x.
7
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of non-metastatic radiation-induced sarcoma of bone.非转移性放射性诱导性骨肉瘤的手术治疗效果和预后因素。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;46(2):293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.036. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Does increased rate of limb-sparing surgery affect survival in osteosarcoma?保肢手术率的增加是否会影响骨肉瘤患者的生存率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Nov;468(11):2854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1423-4.
9
Limb-sparing in patients with non-metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma.非转移性高级别骨肉瘤患者的保肢治疗
J BUON. 2009 Jan-Mar;14(1):63-9.
10
Extra-articular resection of shoulder joint for bone sarcomas: Oncologic and limb-salvage outcomes of 32 cases compared with shoulder disarticulation and forequarter amputation.关节外切除肩关节治疗骨肉瘤:32 例与肩关节离断和前肢切除术相比的肿瘤学和保肢结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(4):612-619. doi: 10.1002/jso.25838. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
NETs-related genes predict prognosis and are correlated with the immune microenvironment in osteosarcoma.与中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NETs)相关的基因可预测骨肉瘤的预后,并与骨肉瘤的免疫微环境相关。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 10;15:1551074. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1551074. eCollection 2025.
2
UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas.英国骨肉瘤管理指南。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Jan;132(1):32-48. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02868-4. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Romanian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for Patients with Extremity Bone Sarcomas.
罗马尼亚肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分系统用于四肢骨肉瘤患者的跨文化调适和验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 8;60(5):778. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050778.
4
Clinical and therapeutical significances of the cluster and signature based on oxidative stress for osteosarcoma.基于氧化应激的聚类和特征在骨肉瘤中的临床和治疗意义。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Dec 29;15(24):15360-15381. doi: 10.18632/aging.205354.
5
Limb-salvage surgery versus extremity amputation for early-stage bone cancer in the extremities: a population-based study.肢体保肢手术与肢体截肢治疗早期肢体骨癌的对比:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Surg. 2023 May 31;10:1147372. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1147372. eCollection 2023.
6
Cancer-Specific Survival after Limb Salvage versus Amputation in Children and Adolescents with Osteosarcoma: A Population-Based Analysis with Propensity Score Matching.骨肉瘤患儿及青少年保肢与截肢术后的癌症特异性生存率:一项基于倾向评分匹配的人群分析
J Oncol. 2023 Apr 8;2023:8635829. doi: 10.1155/2023/8635829. eCollection 2023.
7
Canine osteosarcoma in comparative oncology: Molecular mechanisms through to treatment discovery.比较肿瘤学中的犬骨肉瘤:从分子机制到治疗发现
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 8;9:965391. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.965391. eCollection 2022.
8
Clinical value of ultrasound for the evaluation of local recurrence of primary bone tumors.超声在评估原发性骨肿瘤局部复发中的临床价值。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 15;12:902317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.902317. eCollection 2022.
9
Doxorubicin-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles Coated with Calcium Phosphate as a Potential Tool in Human and Canine Osteosarcoma Therapy.磷酸钙包被的载阿霉素脂质纳米粒作为人和犬骨肉瘤治疗的潜在工具
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 27;14(7):1362. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071362.
10
Impact of Limb Salvage on Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed With Extremity Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas.保肢治疗对四肢骨肉瘤和软组织肉瘤患者预后的影响。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 6;12:873323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873323. eCollection 2022.