Rakonjac Zoran, Brdar Radivoj, Popovic Miroslav
Clinic for Pediatric Surgery, University Clinical Center Banja Luka,, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center Banja Luka,, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Med Arch. 2014 Aug;68(4):254-8. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.254-258. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
The use of radical surgical treatments in treating congenital clubfoot is decreasing. Minimally invasive surgical treatment (MIST) is a way of treating congenital clubfoot, which is a kind of compromise between a radical surgical treatment and non-operational one. A few protocols of different authors McKay, Macnicol, Stevens, Meyer, G.W.Simons and Laaveg-Ponseti were used in the evaluation of the results. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance and role of groups of parameters (clinical, radiographic and functional) in the evaluation of the results in patients treated with the two methods (radical operation and MIST).
This paper covers children who were treated for structural (idiopathic) form of PEVC. The testing is a prospective study and was conducted in two groups of patients. Group A (radical surgical treatment) - control group, where the total number of subjects was 50, out of which 35 male (70%) and 15 female (30%). The number of feet tested was 88. Group B (minimally invasive surgical treatment-MIST)-experimental group. The total number of subjects was 48, out of which 35 male (73%) and 13 female (27%). The number of feet tested was 84. For the analysis of the results, we used a questionnaire. The total number of parameters was fifteen, clinical, radiographic and functional, five parameters of each. Normal findings or measured value was determined by 0 points. The range of the total score (TS-a- total score range) 0-27 points, and the results were sorted out into the folowing categories: good result (0-5) satisfactory (6-11), poor (12-19) and deformity recrudescence (20-27) points.
The proportion of good results at 88 feet in group A was 0,477 as at 84 feet in group B it was significantly higher and came to 0,893. The difference between these proportions is statistically highly significant (t = 5.84, p <0.001). Chi-square test (χ2 = 30.083 df = 1 N = 172, p <0.001) indicated that there is a highly significant correlation between the method of treatment used and results of treatment. Good results of treatment in group A were observed in 48% and in group B in 88% of cases. The Charles Spearman nonparametric method showed that the rank correlation coefficients for the group A are positive, quite high (between 0.70 and 0.85), similar and statistically highly significant (p <0.001). The influence of radiographic scores on the total score is the lowest, and clinical score on the overall score is the highest. Rank correlation coefficients for group B were also positive but somewhat smaller than in group A (between 0.55 and 0.75) and statistically highly significant (p <0.001). It is possible to notice the difference here and say that the impact of functional scores on the total score is the highest and of radiographic score the lowest.
Minimally invasive surgical treatment (MIST) gives better functional results in the treatment of congenital clubfoot than radical surgical treatment. The role of radigraphic parameters in the evaluation of the results of the treatment was the slightest regardless of whether the treatment was radical surgery or MIST. We believe that radiography for routine analysis of the results of treatment need not be used.
先天性马蹄内翻足根治性手术治疗的应用正在减少。微创外科治疗(MIST)是治疗先天性马蹄内翻足的一种方式,它是根治性手术治疗与非手术治疗之间的一种折衷方案。不同作者(麦凯、麦克尼科尔、史蒂文斯、迈耶、G.W.西蒙斯和拉韦格 - 庞塞蒂)的一些方案被用于评估结果。
确定参数组(临床、影像学和功能)在评估两种治疗方法(根治性手术和MIST)治疗患者结果中的重要性和作用。
本文涵盖了因结构性(特发性)马蹄内翻足接受治疗的儿童。该测试是一项前瞻性研究,在两组患者中进行。A组(根治性手术治疗)——对照组,受试者总数为50人,其中男性35人(70%),女性15人(30%)。测试的足部数量为88只。B组(微创外科治疗 - MIST)——实验组。受试者总数为48人,其中男性35人(73%),女性13人(27%)。测试的足部数量为84只。为分析结果,我们使用了一份问卷。参数总数为15个,包括临床、影像学和功能参数,每种各5个。正常结果或测量值定为0分。总分范围(TS - a - 总分范围)为0 - 27分,结果分为以下几类:良好结果(0 - 5分)、满意(6 - 11分)、差(12 - 19分)和畸形复发(20 - 27分)。
A组88只足部的良好结果比例为0.477,而B组84只足部的该比例显著更高,达到0.893。这些比例之间的差异在统计学上具有高度显著性(t = 5.84,p < 0.001)。卡方检验(χ2 = 30.083,自由度 = 1,N = 172,p < 0.001)表明所采用的治疗方法与治疗结果之间存在高度显著的相关性。A组治疗的良好结果在48%的病例中观察到,B组为88%。查尔斯·斯皮尔曼非参数方法表明,A组的等级相关系数为正,相当高(在0.70至0.85之间),相似且在统计学上具有高度显著性(p < 0.001)。影像学评分对总分的影响最低,而临床评分对总分的影响最高。B组的等级相关系数也为正,但比A组略小(在0.55至0.75之间)且在统计学上具有高度显著性(p < 0.001)。在此可以注意到差异,并表明功能评分对总分的影响最高,而影像学评分的影响最低。
微创外科治疗(MIST)在先天性马蹄内翻足治疗中比根治性手术治疗能带来更好的功能结果。无论治疗是根治性手术还是MIST,影像学参数在评估治疗结果中的作用最小。我们认为无需使用影像学检查进行治疗结果的常规分析。