Ghenbot Rahel G, Patel Kamlesh B, Skolnick Gary B, Naidoo Sybill D, Smyth Matthew D, Woo Albert S
From the *Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Institute, and †Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jan;26(1):161-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001236.
There have been conflicting reports on how sagittal synostosis affects cranial vault volume (CVV) and which surgical approach best normalizes skull volume. In this study, we compared CVV and cranial index (CI) of children with sagittal synostosis (before and after surgery) with those of control subjects. We also compared the effect of repair type on surgical outcome.
Computed tomography scans of 32 children with sagittal synostosis and 61 age- and sex-matched control subjects were evaluated using previously validated segmentation software for CVV and CI. Sixteen cases underwent open surgery, and 16 underwent endoscopic surgery. Twenty-seven cases had both preoperative and postoperative scans.
Age of subjects at computed tomography scan ranged from 1 to 9 months preoperatively and 15 to 25 months postoperatively. Mean age difference between cases and matched control subjects was 5 days. The mean CVV of cases preoperatively was nonsignificantly (17 mL) smaller than that of control subjects (P = 0.51). The mean CVV of postoperative children was nonsignificantly (24 mL) larger than that of control subjects (P = 0.51). Adjusting for age and sex, there was no significant difference in CVV between open and endoscopic cases postoperatively (β = 48 mL, P = 0.31). The mean CI increased 12% in both groups. There was no significant difference in mean postoperative CI (P = 0.18) between the 2 groups.
Preoperatively, children with sagittal synostosis have no significant difference in CVV compared with control subjects. Type of surgery does not seem to affect CI and CVV 1 year postoperatively. Both open and endoscopic procedures result in CVVs similar to control subjects.
关于矢状缝早闭如何影响颅腔容积(CVV)以及哪种手术方法能最佳地使颅骨容积恢复正常,一直存在相互矛盾的报道。在本研究中,我们比较了矢状缝早闭患儿(手术前后)与对照组受试者的CVV和颅指数(CI)。我们还比较了修复类型对手术结果的影响。
使用先前验证的分割软件对32例矢状缝早闭患儿和61例年龄及性别匹配的对照受试者的计算机断层扫描进行CVV和CI评估。16例接受开放手术,16例接受内镜手术。27例有术前和术后扫描。
计算机断层扫描时受试者的年龄术前为1至9个月,术后为15至25个月。病例与匹配对照受试者之间的平均年龄差为5天。病例术前的平均CVV比对照受试者略小(17 mL),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.51)。术后儿童的平均CVV比对照受试者略大(24 mL),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.51)。调整年龄和性别后,开放手术和内镜手术病例术后的CVV无显著差异(β = 48 mL,P = 0.31)。两组的平均CI均增加了12%。两组之间术后平均CI无显著差异(P = 0.18)。
术前,矢状缝早闭患儿的CVV与对照受试者相比无显著差异。手术类型似乎不影响术后1年的CI和CVV。开放手术和内镜手术均可使CVV与对照受试者相似。