• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过民间社会行动实现健康权的四条战略途径:埃及背景下的挑战与实践经验教训

Four strategic pathways for the realization of the right to health through civil society actions: challenges and practical lessons learned in the Egyptian context.

作者信息

Sabae Ayman

机构信息

Researcher at the right to health program of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2014 Dec 11;16(2):E104-15.

PMID:25569719
Abstract

This article examines four distinctly different, yet fully complementary, strategic pathways adopted by the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), an Egyptian independent human rights organization, in its practical efforts to protect and guarantee the realization of the right to health to all Egyptians. It reflects upon practical experiences, covering strategic options that include proposing new legislation to policy makers, participatory formulation of new laws from the ground up, public advocacy, coalition building, and litigation. It also examines several factors that affect the decision on which strategic pathway to follow. It reflects on the politico-economic settings, the presence of political will, the scope and extent of impacted stakeholders and the degree of complexity of the cause in question.

摘要

本文探讨了埃及个人权利倡议组织(EIPR)所采用的四条截然不同但又完全互补的战略途径。EIPR是埃及的一个独立人权组织,该组织在切实保护和保障全体埃及人健康权实现的努力中采用了这些途径。文章反思了实际经验,涵盖了一系列战略选择,包括向政策制定者提议新立法、自下而上地参与新法律的制定、公众宣传、建立联盟以及诉讼。此外,文章还研究了影响选择战略途径的若干因素,反思了政治经济环境、政治意愿的存在、受影响利益相关者的范围和程度以及相关问题的复杂程度。

相似文献

1
Four strategic pathways for the realization of the right to health through civil society actions: challenges and practical lessons learned in the Egyptian context.通过民间社会行动实现健康权的四条战略途径:埃及背景下的挑战与实践经验教训
Health Hum Rights. 2014 Dec 11;16(2):E104-15.
2
Litigating the right to health: what can we learn from a comparative law and health care systems approach.诉讼健康权:我们能从比较法和医疗保健系统方法中学到什么。
Health Hum Rights. 2014 Dec 11;16(2):E62-72.
3
Considering strategic litigation as an advocacy tool: a case study of the defence of reproductive rights in Colombia.将战略诉讼视为一种维权工具:哥伦比亚生殖权利辩护案例研究
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):31-41. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44804-3.
4
Courts and health policy: judicial policy making and publicly funded health care in Canada.法院与卫生政策:加拿大的司法决策与公共资助的医疗保健
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Apr;27(2):213-40. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-2-213.
5
Why law pervades medicine: an essay on ethics in health care.法律为何渗透于医学:一篇关于医疗保健伦理的文章。
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 2000;14(1):245-303.
6
Disability: a voice in Australian bioethics?残疾:在澳大利亚生物伦理学中有发言权吗?
N Z Bioeth J. 2003 Jun;4(2):15-20.
7
Human rights in patient care: a theoretical and practical framework.患者护理中的人权:理论与实践框架
Health Hum Rights. 2013 Dec 12;15(2):7-19.
8
Advancing human rights in patient care through strategic litigation: challenging medical confidentiality issues in countries in transition.通过战略诉讼促进患者护理中的人权:挑战转型国家的医疗保密问题。
Health Hum Rights. 2013 Dec 12;15(2):69-79.
9
Perspectives on the Mental Health Act 2014 (Vic).关于2014年《精神卫生法》(维多利亚州)的观点
Australas Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;22(6):569-72. doi: 10.1177/1039856214555342. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.权利与尊严:国会、最高法院以及潘恩赫斯特案后的残疾人权益
West New Engl Law Rev. 1983 Winter;5(3):327-61.

引用本文的文献

1
An Independent Review and Accountability Mechanism for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Possibilities of a Framework Convention on Global Health.可持续发展目标的独立审查与问责机制:全球健康框架公约的可能性
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun;18(1):129-140.