Jewitt Natalie, Hope Andrew J, Milne Robin, Le Lisa W, Papadakos Janet, Abdelmutti Nazek, Catton Pamela, Giuliani Meredith E
Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Mar;31(1):70-4. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0780-1.
Patients treated for lung cancer are often elderly presenting a unique challenge for developing patient education materials. This study developed and evaluated a patient education pamphlet on lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) designed specifically for an elderly population. The SBRT pamphlet was developed using a participatory design involving a convenience sample of patients. This prospective study assessed patient's opinions of pamphlet effectiveness through self-report questionnaires. The pamphlet was deemed "effective" if patients rated 16/18 evaluation statements as "strongly agree" or "agree." Demographic data and health literacy (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine short-form (REALM-SF)) were also assessed. Patient opinion of pamphlet "effectiveness" was compared between patients with REALM-SF scores of 7 versus <7 using Fisher's exact test. The overall EQ-5D-5L score was compared for patients who did and did not find the pamphlet effective using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-seven patients participated. The median age was 76 years (range 56-93) and 22 patients (59 %) had ≤high school education. Most patients preferred to have verbal (65 %) or written (78 %) educational materials as opposed to online information or educational classes. Thirty-two patients (86 %) rated the pamphlet as effective. The proportion of patients who found the pamphlet effective was 85.7 versus 86.7 % (p = 1.00) in those with REALM 7 versus <7. The mean EQ-5D score was 67.5 (SD 19.1) versus 71.8 (SD 8.7) (p = 0.84) in those who found the pamphlet effective versus not. Participatory design is an effective method for developing education materials for challenging patient groups such as elderly patients. Despite advanced age and comorbidity, this patient group had adequate health literacy.
接受肺癌治疗的患者往往年事已高,这给开发患者教育材料带来了独特的挑战。本研究开发并评估了一份专门为老年人群设计的关于肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的患者教育手册。SBRT手册采用参与式设计,涉及一个方便样本的患者。这项前瞻性研究通过自我报告问卷评估了患者对手册有效性的看法。如果患者将18条评估陈述中的16条评为“强烈同意”或“同意”,则该手册被视为“有效”。还评估了人口统计学数据和健康素养(医学成人识字快速评估简表(REALM-SF))。使用Fisher精确检验比较了REALM-SF评分≥7与<7的患者对手册“有效性”的看法。使用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验比较了认为手册有效和无效的患者的总体EQ-5D-5L评分。37名患者参与了研究。中位年龄为76岁(范围56-93岁),22名患者(59%)的教育程度≤高中。与在线信息或教育课程相比,大多数患者更喜欢有口头(65%)或书面(78%)的教育材料。32名患者(86%)将手册评为有效。在REALM评分≥7与<7的患者中,认为手册有效的比例分别为85.7%和86.7%(p = 1.00)。认为手册有效的患者的平均EQ-5D评分为67.5(标准差19.1),而认为手册无效的患者为71.8(标准差8.7)(p = 0.84)。参与式设计是为老年患者等具有挑战性的患者群体开发教育材料的有效方法。尽管年龄较大且存在合并症,但该患者群体具有足够的健康素养。