Alexander Neal D E
MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Mar;109(3):173-4. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru204. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Lymphatic filariasis has been targeted for elimination by 2020, and a threshold of 65% coverage of mass drug administration (MDA) has been adopted by the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF). A recent review by Babu and Babu of 36 studies of MDA for lymphatic filariasis in India found that coverage, defined as receipt of tablets, ranged from 48.8 to 98.8%, while compliance, defined as actual ingestion of tablets, was 22% lower on average. Moreover, the denominator for these coverage figures is the eligible, rather than total, population. By contrast, the 65% threshold, in the original modelling study, refers to ingestion of tablets in the total population. This corresponds to GPELF's use of 'epidemiological drug coverage' as a trigger for the Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS), which indicate whether to proceed to post-MDA surveillance. The existence of less strict definitions of 'coverage' should not lead to premature TAS that could impair MDA's sustainability.
淋巴丝虫病的消除目标是到2020年实现,全球消除淋巴丝虫病规划(GPELF)采用了群体服药(MDA)覆盖率达到65%的门槛值。巴布和巴布最近对印度36项关于淋巴丝虫病群体服药的研究进行了综述,发现覆盖率(定义为接受药片)在48.8%至98.8%之间,而依从性(定义为实际服用药片)平均低22%。此外,这些覆盖率数字的分母是符合条件的人群,而非总人口。相比之下,在最初的建模研究中,65%的门槛值指的是总人口中的药片服用情况。这与GPELF使用“流行病学药物覆盖率”作为传播评估调查(TAS)的触发条件相对应,TAS用于表明是否进入群体服药后监测阶段。对“覆盖率”存在不太严格的定义不应导致过早进行TAS,否则可能损害群体服药的可持续性。