Suppr超能文献

评估北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市的街道自行车道有效性并评估对骑自行车者的风险。

Evaluating the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane and assessing risk to bicyclists in Charlotte, North Carolina.

作者信息

Pulugurtha Srinivas S, Thakur Vidya

机构信息

Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Director of Infrastructure, Design, Environment, and Sustainability (IDEAS) Center, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA.

Graduate Student of Civil & Environmental Engineering. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Mar;76:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Abstract

The objectives of this manuscript are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane in reducing crashes involving bicyclists on urban roads, (2) to quantify and compare risk to bicyclists on road segments with and without on-street bicycle lane, (3) to evaluate the effect of on-street bicycle lane on other road network users (all crashes), and, (4) to assess the role of on-network characteristics (speed limit, the number of lanes, the width of on-street bicycle lane, the width of the right-most travel lane, and, the numbers of driveways, unsignalized approaches and signalized intersections per unit distance) on risk to bicyclists. Data for thirty-six segments with on-street bicycle lane and twenty-six segments without on-street bicycle lane in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina were extracted to compute and compare measures such as the number of bicycle crashes per center-lane mile, the number of bicycle crashes per annual million vehicle miles traveled (MVMT), the number of all crashes per center-lane mile, and the number of all crashes per MVMT. The results obtained from analysis indicate that bicyclists are three to four times at higher risk (based on traffic conditions) on segments without on-street bicycle lane than when compared to segments with on-street bicycle lane. An analysis conducted considering all crashes showed that on-street bicycle lanes do not have a statistically significant negative effect on overall safety. An increase in annual MVMT (exposure) and the number of signalized intersections per mile increases the number of bicycle crashes, while an increase in on-street bicycle lane width or right-most travel lane width (if on-street bicycle lane cannot be provided) decreases the number of bicycle crashes. Installing wider on-street bicycle lanes, limiting driveways to less than 50 per mile and unsignalized approaches to less than 10 per mile, increasing spacing between signalized intersections, and, facilitating wider right-most travel lane if on-street bicycle lane cannot be provided reduces occurrence of bicycle crashes and lowers risk to bicyclists on roads.

摘要

本论文的目标如下

(1)评估城市道路上的路侧自行车道在减少涉及骑自行车者的撞车事故方面的有效性;(2)量化并比较有路侧自行车道和无路侧自行车道的路段上骑自行车者面临的风险;(3)评估路侧自行车道对其他道路网络使用者的影响(所有撞车事故);以及(4)评估网络特征(限速、车道数量、路侧自行车道宽度、最右侧行车道宽度,以及每单位距离的车道出入口数量、无信号灯接入道路数量和信号灯控制交叉口数量)对骑自行车者面临风险的作用。提取了北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市36个有路侧自行车道的路段和26个无路侧自行车道的路段的数据,以计算和比较诸如每中心车道英里的自行车撞车事故数量、每百万车英里年行驶里程(MVMT)的自行车撞车事故数量、每中心车道英里的所有撞车事故数量,以及每MVMT的所有撞车事故数量等指标。分析得出的结果表明,与有路侧自行车道的路段相比,在无路侧自行车道的路段上,骑自行车者面临的风险(基于交通状况)要高出三到四倍。对所有撞车事故进行的分析表明,路侧自行车道对整体安全没有统计学上的显著负面影响。年MVMT(暴露量)和每英里信号灯控制交叉口数量的增加会导致自行车撞车事故数量增加,而路侧自行车道宽度或最右侧行车道宽度(如果无法设置路侧自行车道)的增加会减少自行车撞车事故数量。设置更宽的路侧自行车道、将车道出入口限制在每英里少于50个且无信号灯接入道路限制在每英里少于10个、增加信号灯控制交叉口之间的间距,以及在无法设置路侧自行车道时设置更宽的最右侧行车道,可减少自行车撞车事故的发生,并降低道路上骑自行车者面临的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验