• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007-2010.2007-2010 年爱荷华州道路自行车设施与自行车事故分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jul;56:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane and assessing risk to bicyclists in Charlotte, North Carolina.评估北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市的街道自行车道有效性并评估对骑自行车者的风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Mar;76:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
3
On-road bicycle lane types, roadway characteristics, and risks for bicycle crashes.道路上的自行车道类型、道路特征与自行车碰撞事故风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
4
Developing Bicycle-Vehicle Crash-Specific Safety Performance Functions in Alabama Using Different Techniques.利用不同技术在阿拉巴马州开发针对自行车-车辆碰撞的特定安全绩效函数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105735. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105735. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Evaluating the safety effects of bicycle lanes in New York City.评估纽约市自行车道的安全效果。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1120-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300319. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
6
Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception.混合交通街道中段的自行车与车辆交互作用:考察超车距离和自行车舒适性感知。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
7
"Bicycles May Use Full Lane" Signage Communicates U.S. Roadway Rules and Increases Perception of Safety.“自行车可使用整条车道”标识传达了美国道路规则并增强了安全感。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136973. eCollection 2015.
8
Geometric road design factors affecting the risk of urban run-off crashes. A case-control study.道路几何设计因素对城市径流碰撞风险的影响。一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234564. eCollection 2020.
9
The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature.交通基础设施对自行车事故和碰撞的影响:文献综述。
Environ Health. 2009 Oct 21;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.
10
Database improvements for motor vehicle/bicycle crash analysis.机动车/自行车碰撞分析的数据库改进
Inj Prev. 2015 Aug;21(4):221-30. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041317. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
An analysis of bicycle accidents with respect to spatial heterogeneity.关于空间异质性的自行车事故分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 9;13(1):21812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49143-9.
3
Analysis of Risky Riding Behavior Characteristics of the Related Road Traffic Injuries of Electric Bicycle Riders.分析电动自行车骑手相关道路交通伤害的危险骑行行为特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;20(7):5352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075352.
4
Risk Factors for Road-Traffic Injuries Associated with E-Bike: Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.电动自行车相关道路交通伤害的危险因素:病例对照和病例交叉研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095186.
5
Weekday bicycle traffic and crash rates during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间工作日的自行车交通流量及事故率
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101289. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101289. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
6
Analysis of Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Crashes in San Antonio, Texas.德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市自行车-机动车碰撞事故分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;18(17):9220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179220.
7
Incidence and Profile of Severe Cycling Injuries After Bikeway Infrastructure Changes.自行车道基础设施改变后严重骑车受伤的发生率和特征。
J Community Health. 2020 Jun;45(3):542-549. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00773-z.
8
On-road bicycle lane types, roadway characteristics, and risks for bicycle crashes.道路上的自行车道类型、道路特征与自行车碰撞事故风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
9
Built environment effects on bike crash frequency and risk in Beijing.北京市建成环境对自行车碰撞频率和风险的影响。
J Safety Res. 2018 Feb;64:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
10
Examination of adult and child bicyclist safety-relevant events using naturalistic bicycling methodology.使用自然骑行方法对成人和儿童自行车骑行者与安全相关的事件进行检查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Planning for Pedestrians and Bicyclists: Results From a Statewide Municipal Survey.行人与自行车骑行者规划:一项全州范围城市调查的结果
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S275-S284. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s275.
2
Is the three-foot bicycle passing law working in Baltimore, Maryland?马里兰州巴尔的摩的“三英尺法案”(自行车路权法案)是否奏效?
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
3
Pedestrian and bicycle planning in rural communities: tools for active living.农村社区的行人和自行车规划:促进积极生活的工具。
Fam Community Health. 2011 Apr-Jun;34(2):173-81. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e31820e0d47.
4
Road factors and bicycle-motor vehicle crashes at unsignalized priority intersections.无信号优先交叉路口的道路因素与自行车-机动车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):853-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
5
Installation of bicycle lanes and increased ridership in an urban, mixed-income setting in New Orleans, Louisiana.在路易斯安那州新奥尔良市的一个城市、混合收入环境中安装自行车道和增加骑行量。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S98-S102. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s98.
6
The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature.交通基础设施对自行车事故和碰撞的影响:文献综述。
Environ Health. 2009 Oct 21;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.
7
The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport.风险的非线性与环境可持续交通的促进。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Jul;41(4):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 9.
8
Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender.超越骑自行车者的驾驶员:关于骑行姿势、头盔使用、车辆类型和表观性别的影响的客观数据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Mar;39(2):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
9
Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.人行横道标线与老年行人发生行人-机动车碰撞事故的风险
JAMA. 2002 Nov 6;288(17):2136-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2136.

2007-2010 年爱荷华州道路自行车设施与自行车事故分析。

On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007-2010.

机构信息

Injury Prevention Research Center, University of Iowa, 2186 WL, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jul;56:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031
PMID:23337741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8785229/
Abstract

PURPOSE

An average of 611 deaths and over 47,000 bicyclists are injured in traffic-related crashes in the United States each year. Efforts to increase bicycle safety are needed to reduce and prevent injuries and fatalities, especially as trends indicate that ridership is increasing rapidly. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of bicycle-specific roadway facilities (e.g., signage and bicycle lanes) in reducing bicycle crashes.

METHODS

We conducted a case site-control site study of 147 bicycle crash-sites identified from the Iowa Department of Transportation crash database from 2007 to 2010 and 147 matched non-crash sites. Control sites were randomly selected from intersections matched to case sites on neighborhood (census block group) and road classification (arterial, feeder, collector, etc.). We examined crash risk by any on-road bicycle facility present and by facility type (pavement markings--bicycle lanes and shared lane arrows, bicycle-specific signage, and the combination of markings and signage), controlling for bicycle volume, motor vehicle volume, street width, sidewalks, and traffic controls.

RESULTS

A total of 11.6% of case sites and 15.0% of controls had an on-road bicycle facility. Case intersections had higher bicycle volume (3.52 vs. 3.34 per 30 min) and motor vehicle volume (248.77 vs. 205.76 per 30 min) than controls. Our results are suggestive that the presence of an on-road bicycle facility decreases crash risk by as much as 60% with a bicycle lane or shared lane arrow (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.09-1.82) and 38% with bicycle-specific signage (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.15-2.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Investments in bicycle-specific pavement markings and signage have been shown to be beneficial to traffic flow, and our results suggest that they may also reduce the number of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes and subsequent injuries and fatalities. As a relatively low-cost traffic feature, community considerations for further implementation of these facilities are justified.

摘要

目的

每年在美国,平均有 611 人死亡,47000 多名骑自行车的人在与交通相关的事故中受伤。需要努力提高自行车安全性,以减少和预防伤害和死亡,特别是因为趋势表明骑行率正在迅速增加。本研究的目的是评估自行车专用道路设施(例如标志和自行车道)减少自行车事故的效果。

方法

我们对 2007 年至 2010 年爱荷华州交通部事故数据库中确定的 147 个自行车事故现场和 147 个匹配的非事故现场进行了病例对照现场研究。对照现场是从与病例现场在社区(人口普查街区组)和道路分类(动脉、支线、收集器等)相匹配的交叉口中随机选择的。我们通过存在的任何道路自行车设施以及设施类型(路面标记-自行车道和共享车道箭头、自行车专用标志以及标记和标志的组合)来检查碰撞风险,同时控制自行车数量、机动车数量、街道宽度、人行道和交通控制。

结果

病例现场有 11.6%,对照现场有 15.0%有道路自行车设施。病例交叉口的自行车数量(每 30 分钟 3.52 辆)和机动车数量(每 30 分钟 248.77 辆)高于对照。我们的结果表明,存在道路自行车设施可使自行车道或共享车道箭头的碰撞风险降低多达 60%(OR=0.40,95%CI=0.09-1.82),自行车专用标志的碰撞风险降低 38%(OR=0.62,95%CI=0.15-2.58)。

结论

已经证明,投资于自行车专用路面标记和标志对交通流量有益,我们的结果表明,它们还可能减少自行车与机动车碰撞的数量以及随后的伤害和死亡。作为一种相对低成本的交通特征,社区有理由考虑进一步实施这些设施。