Suppr超能文献

在以患者为中心的医疗保健中,应该由谁来决定多少信息以及哪些信息是重要的呢?

Who should decide how much and what information is important in person-centred health care?

作者信息

Kaltoft Mette Kjer, Nielsen Jesper Bo, Salkeld Glenn, Dowie Jack

机构信息

PhD student, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Professor, Head of Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):192-5. doi: 10.1177/1355819614567911. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

Abstract

Most guidelines for clinical practice, and especially those for the construction of decision support tools, assume that the individual person (the patient) needs to be in possession of information of particular sorts and amount in order to qualify as having made an 'informed decision'. This often implicitly segues into the patient having made a 'good decision'. In person-centred health care, whether, in what form, and with what weight, 'information' is included as a criterion of decision quality is a matter for the person involved, to decide in the light of their own values, preferences, and time and resource constraints.

摘要

大多数临床实践指南,尤其是那些关于决策支持工具构建的指南,都假定个人(患者)需要掌握特定种类和数量的信息,才能被认定为做出了“知情决策”。这往往会隐含地转变为患者做出了“正确决策”。在以患者为中心的医疗保健中,“信息”是否、以何种形式以及具有多大权重被纳入决策质量的标准,这是相关人员根据自身价值观、偏好以及时间和资源限制来决定的事情。

相似文献

1
Who should decide how much and what information is important in person-centred health care?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):192-5. doi: 10.1177/1355819614567911. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
2
Patients' perspectives on person-centred participation in healthcare: a framework analysis.
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Mar;21(2):129-47. doi: 10.1177/0969733013490593. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
4
Patient-centred care: improving healthcare outcomes.
Nurs Stand. 2015 Sep 23;30(4):50-7; quiz 59. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.4.50.e10186.
5
Overdue choices: how information and role in decision-making influence women's preferences for induction for prolonged pregnancy.
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):248-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00554.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
Evidence-based medicine meets person-centred care: a collaborative perspective on the relationship.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1047-51. doi: 10.1111/jep.12434. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
How to promote and support a culture of patient-centred openness and transparency in the NHS.
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;67(10):943-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12191.
9
Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
10
PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR QUANTIFYING PATIENT PREFERENCES.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):105-110. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317001118. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer chemotherapy.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 20;14:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-73.
3
Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jun 8;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51.
4
How well do commonly used data presentation formats support comparative effectiveness evaluations?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):840-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12445284. Epub 2012 May 22.
5
Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 5;12:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-149.
6
How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):77S-84S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10379647.
8
Laypersons' understanding of relative risk reductions: randomised cross-sectional study.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jul 17;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-31.
9
Warrants for prescription: analytically and empirically based approaches to improving decision making.
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):102-20. doi: 10.1518/0018720053653811.
10
Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验