Price Amy I, Djulbegovic Ben, Biswas Rakesh, Chatterjee Pranab
Evidence Based Health Care, Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, UK.
USF Program for EBM & Comparative Effectiveness Research, Department of Hematology and Health Outcomes, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa General Hospital.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1047-51. doi: 10.1111/jep.12434. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
In a recent list-serve, the way forward for evidence-based medicine was discussed. The purpose of this paper was to share the reflections and multiple perspectives discussed in this peer-to-peer encounter and to invite the reader to think with a mind for positive change in the practice of health care. Let us begin with a simple question. What if we dared to look at evidence-based medicine (EBM) and informed shared decision making like two wheels on a bike? They both need to be full of substance, well connected, lubricated and working in balance, propelled and guided by a competent driver, with good vision to get the bike where we want it to go. We need all the tools in the toolkit for the bike to stay operational and to meet the needs of the driver. By the same rationale, evidence alone is necessary but not sufficient for decision making; values are necessary and if neglected, may default to feelings based on social pressures and peer influence. Medical decisions, even shared ones, lack focus without evidence and application. Just as a bike may need a tune up from time to time to maintain optimal performance, EBM may benefit from a tune up where we challenge ourselves to move away from general assumptions and traditions and instead think clearly about the issues we face and how to ask well-formed, specific questions to get the answers to meet the needs we face in health care.
在最近的一次邮件列表讨论中,探讨了循证医学的未来发展方向。本文旨在分享在这次同行交流中所讨论的思考和多种观点,并邀请读者以一种致力于推动医疗保健实践积极变革的思维方式进行思考。让我们从一个简单的问题开始。要是我们敢于将循证医学(EBM)和知情共同决策看作自行车的两个轮子会怎样呢?它们都需要充实、连接良好、得到润滑且保持平衡运转,由一位有能力的驾驶员推动并引导,这位驾驶员要有良好的视野,才能让自行车驶向我们想去的地方。我们需要工具包里的所有工具,才能让自行车保持运转并满足驾驶员的需求。同理,仅靠证据对于决策来说是必要的,但并不充分;价值观也是必要的,如果被忽视,可能会默认基于社会压力和同伴影响而产生的感受。医疗决策,即使是共同决策,如果没有证据和应用,也会缺乏重点。就像自行车可能需要时不时地调试以保持最佳性能一样,循证医学可能会从一次调试中受益,在这次调试中,我们挑战自己摆脱一般的假设和传统,而是清晰地思考我们面临的问题,以及如何提出结构良好、具体的问题,以获得答案来满足我们在医疗保健中所面临的需求。