Suppr超能文献

韩国患者中低风险前列腺癌的分期升级和病情进展:一项多中心研究。

Upgrading and upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer among Korean patients: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Hwang Insang, Lim Donghoon, Jeong Young Beom, Park Seung Chol, Noh Jun Hwa, Kwon Dong Deuk, Kang Taek Won

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):811-4. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143751.

Abstract

Only 54% of prostate cancer cases in Korea are localized compared with 82% of cases in the US. Furthermore, half of Korean patients are upgraded after radical prostatectomy (41.6%-50.6%). We investigated the risk factors for upgrading and/or upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1159 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at five hospitals in Honam Province. Preoperative data on standard clinicopathological parameters were collected. The radical prostatectomy specimens were graded and staged and we defined a "worsening prognosis" as a Gleason score ≥ 7 or upstaging to ≥ pT3. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with postoperative pathological upstaging. Among the 1159 patients, 324 were classified into the clinically low-risk group, and 154 (47.5%) patients were either upgraded or upstaged. The multivariable analysis revealed that the preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level (odds ratio [OR], 1.131; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007-1.271; P= 0.037), percent positive biopsy core (OR: 1.018; 95% CI: 1.002-1.035; P= 0.032), and small prostate volume (≤30 ml) (OR: 2.280; 95% CI: 1.351-3.848; P= 0.002) were predictive of a worsening prognosis. Overall, 47.5% of patients with low-risk disease were upstaged postoperatively. The current risk stratification criteria may be too relaxed for our study cohort.

摘要

在韩国,只有54%的前列腺癌病例处于局部阶段,而美国这一比例为82%。此外,韩国一半的患者在根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级上升(41.6%-50.6%)。我们调查了根治性前列腺切除术后低风险前列腺癌分级上升和/或分期上升的危险因素。我们回顾性分析了全罗南道五家医院1159例行根治性前列腺切除术患者的病历。收集了标准临床病理参数的术前数据。对根治性前列腺切除术标本进行分级和分期,我们将“预后恶化”定义为Gleason评分≥7或分期上升至≥pT3。采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估与术后病理分期上升相关的因素。在1159例患者中,324例被归类为临床低风险组,154例(47.5%)患者出现分级上升或分期上升。多变量分析显示,术前血清前列腺特异性抗原水平(比值比[OR],1.131;95%置信区间[CI],1.007-1.271;P=0.037)、活检阳性核心百分比(OR:1.018;95%CI:1.002-1.035;P=0.032)和前列腺体积小(≤30ml)(OR:2.280;95%CI:1.351-3.848;P=0.002)可预测预后恶化。总体而言,47.5%的低风险疾病患者术后分期上升。对于我们的研究队列,目前的风险分层标准可能过于宽松。

相似文献

1
Upgrading and upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer among Korean patients: a multicenter study.
Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):811-4. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143751.
3
Comparison of pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean patients with serum PSA ranges.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Mar;30(3):317-22. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.3.317. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
4
Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Asian J Androl. 2016 Jul-Aug;18(4):639-43. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.169984.
10
Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
[Risk factors analysis and nomogram model construction of postoperative pathological upgrade of prostate cancer patients with single core positive biopsy].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 18;56(5):896-901. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.05.022.
2
The feasibility of distance to the tumor of biopsy cores to estimate the extracapsular extension.
Prostate Int. 2023 Dec;11(4):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
4
A single-center long-term experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: 15 years of follow-up.
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jan;62(1):32-38. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200206. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
5
Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option?
Indian J Urol. 2020 Jul-Sep;36(3):184-190. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_37_20. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Oct 29;13:971. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.971. eCollection 2019.
9
Updated clinical results of active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in Korean men: 8 years of follow-up.
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 May;58(3):164-170. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.164. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
4
Predictive models for worsening prognosis in potential candidates for active surveillance of presumed low-risk prostate cancer.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Apr;44(2):459-70. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0020-0. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
5
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1708-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011967.
6
Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2185-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
7
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
9
Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre 'Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance' study.
BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(7):956-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08887.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
10
Radical prostatectomy findings in patients in whom active surveillance of prostate cancer fails.
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验