Sippel K, Seifert B, Hafner J
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 31, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.11.005. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Compression therapy is highly effective in the treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome and venous leg ulcer. On average, 50-60% of the patients cooperate with compression therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the user-friendliness. This prospective study investigated whether the use of donning devices can contribute to improving user-friendliness.
Forty patients aged >65 years with severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI; C4-C6) successively donned compression stockings in a randomized order: one 40 mmHg (CS40) or two superimposed 20 mmHg (CS20+20), each with open toe (CS-o-t) and closed toe (CS-c-t), using donning devices (three foot slips for CS-o-t; two foot slips and three frames for CS-c-t). The study endpoint was that the stocking was completely donned and correctly positioned on the patient's leg. The success rate and its association with age, sex, first time versus second time user, body mass index, abdominal circumference, ability to reach the forefoot with the hand, and hand grip strength were analyzed. Additionally, subjective evaluation by the patients was performed.
Without donning devices, success with CS40-c-t was 60% (24/40 patients) and with CS20+20-c-t 70% (28/40 patients) (p = .220). Using donning devices increased success rates significantly. With CS40-o-t the success rate was 88% (35/40 patients; p = .001) and with CS40-c-t it was 90% (36/40 patients; p = .002). With CS20+20-o-t and CS20+20-c-t, the success rate was 88% (35/40 patients; p = .016). The proportion of patients who successfully used either CS40 or CS20+20 increased from 73% to 93%. Relevant for the patients' success was the ability to reach the forefoot with the hand, and hand grip strength. Subjectively, donning with a device was rated significantly better than without.
Donning devices significantly improve the ability of elderly patients with CVI to don compression stockings successfully. However, there are differences in user-friendliness among the devices..
目的/背景:压迫疗法在治疗血栓后综合征和下肢静脉溃疡方面非常有效。平均而言,50%至60%的患者会配合压迫疗法。因此,有必要提高其用户友好性。这项前瞻性研究调查了使用穿戴装置是否有助于提高用户友好性。
40名年龄大于65岁的重度慢性静脉功能不全(CVI;C4 - C6)患者,以随机顺序依次穿戴压力袜:一种40 mmHg(CS40)或两种叠加的20 mmHg(CS20 + 20),每种都有露趾(CS - o - t)和闭趾(CS - c - t)款式,使用穿戴装置(CS - o - t用三个脚套;CS - c - t用两个脚套和三个框架)。研究终点是压力袜完全穿戴好并正确放置在患者腿上。分析成功率及其与年龄、性别、首次使用与再次使用、体重指数、腹围、用手够到前脚掌的能力以及握力的关联。此外,还对患者进行了主观评估。
不使用穿戴装置时,CS40 - c - t的成功率为60%(24/40名患者),CS20 + 20 - c - t的成功率为70%(28/40名患者)(p = 0.220)。使用穿戴装置显著提高了成功率。CS40 - o - t的成功率为88%(35/40名患者;p = 0.001),CS40 - c - t的成功率为90%(36/40名患者;p = 0.002)。CS20 + 20 - o - t和CS20 + 20 - c - t的成功率为88%(35/40名患者;p = 0.016)。成功使用CS40或CS20 + 20的患者比例从73%增加到93%。对患者成功有影响的是用手够到前脚掌的能力和握力。主观上,使用装置穿戴的评价明显优于不使用装置。
穿戴装置显著提高了老年CVI患者成功穿戴压力袜的能力。然而,不同装置在用户友好性方面存在差异。