Suppr超能文献

骶神经调节治疗大便失禁:一项前瞻性单中心随机交叉研究的结果

Sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence: results of a prospective single-center randomized crossover study.

作者信息

Kahlke Volker, Topic Heidi, Peleikis Hans G, Jongen Johannes

机构信息

1Proctological Office Kiel, Department of Surgical Proctology, Park-Klinik, Kiel, Germany 2School of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany 3Department of Internal Medicine, Imland Klinik, Rendsburg, Germany.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):235-40. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000295.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although sacral nerve modulation has become an important tool for the treatment of fecal incontinence, prospective, randomized data are still rare.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of sacral nerve modulation in a prospective randomized crossover study

DESIGN

: Prospective randomized crossover study

SETTING

: Proctological Office and Department of Surgical Proctology at a private hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 31 consecutive patients (31 women) aged 55 ± 12 years (median ± SD) with fecal incontinence were enrolled between February 2012 and December 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent sacral nerve modulation through a staged implantation procedure between 2009-2011. After a median of 26.8 months following implantation, 16 of the 31 patients agreed to be randomized in a crossover design to stimulation ON or OFF, each for a 3-week period. After the two periods (ie, 6 weeks), while still blinded to the stimulator status, the patients chose which stimulation period (first or second) they preferred. The mode of stimulation corresponding to the selected period was then continued for 3 months (final period).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency of bowel movements, frequency of fecal incontinence and urgency episodes, severity scores, preference for ON or OFF.

RESULTS

The frequency of fecal incontinence episodes and Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) were both significantly lower in the ON period than the OFF period (p < 0.005) during the crossover phase of the study. All patients decided to stay in the ON mode for the final period and have continued in the ON mode until now.

LIMITATIONS

Small patient numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant improvement in fecal incontinence during the ON period, as compared to the OFF period, makes it unlikely that the observed benefits of sacral nerve modulation are due to a placebo effect.

摘要

背景

尽管骶神经调节已成为治疗大便失禁的一项重要手段,但前瞻性随机数据仍然很少。

目的

在一项前瞻性随机交叉研究中确定骶神经调节的有效性。

设计

前瞻性随机交叉研究。

地点

一家私立医院的直肠科办公室和外科直肠科。

患者

2012年2月至2012年12月期间,共纳入31例连续的大便失禁患者(均为女性),年龄55±12岁(中位数±标准差)。

干预措施

所有患者在2009 - 2011年期间通过分阶段植入手术接受骶神经调节。植入后中位数为26.8个月时,31例患者中有16例同意采用交叉设计随机分为刺激开启或关闭组,每组为期3周。在两个阶段(即6周)后,患者在对刺激器状态仍不知情的情况下,选择他们更喜欢的刺激阶段(第一阶段或第二阶段)。然后将与所选阶段对应的刺激模式持续3个月(最后阶段)。

主要观察指标

排便频率、大便失禁频率和尿急发作频率、严重程度评分、对刺激开启或关闭的偏好。

结果

在研究的交叉阶段,刺激开启阶段的大便失禁发作频率和克利夫兰诊所失禁评分(CCIS)均显著低于刺激关闭阶段(p < 0.005)。所有患者在最后阶段都决定保持刺激开启模式,并且至今一直维持该模式。

局限性

患者数量少。

结论

与刺激关闭阶段相比,刺激开启阶段大便失禁有显著改善,这使得骶神经调节所观察到的益处不太可能是由安慰剂效应导致的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验