Suppr超能文献

骶神经刺激对肛门括约肌缺损患者大便失禁的疗效。

Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter defects.

作者信息

Boyle Derek J, Knowles Charles H, Lunniss Peter J, Scott S Mark, Williams Norman S, Gill Kathryn A

机构信息

Centre for Academic Surgery, Gastrointestinal Physiology Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1234-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f7400.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve stimulation has traditionally been used to treat patients with fecal incontinence with intact anal sphincters. This rationale has been challenged, but it remains unknown if its efficacy is related to the extent of the sphincter injury.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 15 patients with sphincter defects (9 combined, 2 external only, and 4 internal only) undergoing sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Endoanal ultrasound scans were reviewed and defects scored (0-16) with use of a system published by two independent observers. These were correlated with the following outcomes: 1) reduction in fecal incontinence episodes, 2) reduction in soiling, 3) improvement in Cleveland Clinic scores, and 4) improvement in ability to defer defecation. All patients were studied after temporary stimulation and again at three to six months after permanent implantation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (87%) progressed to permanent stimulation. Median fecal incontinence episodes per two weeks decreased from 15 (range, 1-53) to 3 (range, 0-16; P = 0.01). Median soiling episodes were reduced from 10 (range, 1-14) to 6 (range, 0-14; P = 0.009). Median Cleveland Clinic scores decreased from 12 (range, 9-18) to 9 (range, 4-14; P = 0.0005). The ability to defer defecation was improved significantly (P = 0.05). There were no relationships between sphincter defect scores and outcome measures after sacral nerve stimulation (r = 0.001-0.10; P = 0.28-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment in patients with fecal incontinence who have anal sphincter defects, and outcome is not associated with severity of sphincter disruption.

摘要

目的

传统上,骶神经刺激用于治疗肛门括约肌完整的大便失禁患者。这一理论依据受到了挑战,但尚不清楚其疗效是否与括约肌损伤程度有关。

方法

这是一项针对15例因大便失禁接受骶神经刺激的括约肌缺陷患者(9例合并缺陷、2例仅为外括约肌缺陷、4例仅为内括约肌缺陷)的前瞻性研究。回顾经肛门超声扫描结果,由两名独立观察者使用已发表的系统对缺陷进行评分(0 - 16分)。将这些评分与以下结果相关联:1)大便失禁发作次数减少;2)污粪情况改善;3)克利夫兰诊所评分提高;4)排便延迟能力改善。所有患者在临时刺激后进行研究,并在永久植入后三至六个月再次进行研究。

结果

13例患者(87%)进展至永久刺激。每两周大便失禁发作次数的中位数从15次(范围1 - 53次)降至3次(范围0 - 16次;P = 0.01)。污粪发作次数的中位数从10次(范围1 - 14次)降至6次(范围0 - 14次;P = 0.009)。克利夫兰诊所评分的中位数从12分(范围9 - 18分)降至9分(范围4 - 14分;P = 0.0005)。排便延迟能力有显著改善(P = 0.05)。骶神经刺激后,括约肌缺陷评分与结果指标之间无相关性(r = 0.001 - 0.10;P = 0.28 - 0.94)。

结论

骶神经刺激对存在肛门括约肌缺陷的大便失禁患者是一种有效的治疗方法,且治疗效果与括约肌损伤的严重程度无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验