Johnston Donald A, Gilmore Tim W, Gosselin Kevin P
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, at the time of this study but is currently affiliated with University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Respir Care. 2015 May;60(5):627-35. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03494. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
Aerosolized albuterol delivery is a mainstay treatment for bronchoconstriction; however, almost no data exist that evaluate the clinical outcome of instillation of an endotracheal liquid bolus (ELB) of a bronchodilator directly into the airway.
This randomized trial sought to evaluate the efficacy of albuterol lavage via artificial airway with accompanied patient positioning. Subjects receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure with clinical manifestations of bronchoconstriction were assigned to initially receive either traditional albuterol via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or albuterol via ELB lavage with follow-up administration of the other therapy after a 4-h washout period. Clinical data were collected at baseline and at 5 and 30 min post-treatment.
Fourteen subjects (5 males, 9 females; mean age of 57.5 y) were included in this study. In the group receiving initial ELB, peak airway pressure decreased significantly (P = .02), and a significant decrease in airway resistance mean scores was seen from baseline to 30 min post-treatment (P < .001) and from 5 to 30 min post-treatment (P = .003), with no significant effects seen with follow-up MDI. In the initial MDI treatment group, no significant effect on peak airway pressure or airway resistance was noted. S(pO2) increased at 5 min post-treatment with ELB. In contrast, S(pO2) decreased 30 min post-treatment with MDI. Mean arterial pressure decreased post-treatment with ELB. The pattern in heart rate change post-treatment with ELB was similar to that post-treatment with MDI, with a significant increase at the 5-min interval from baseline (P < .01), followed by a significant decrease at the 30-min interval (P < .001). There were no differences in dynamic compliance at each time interval following administration of both the MDI (P = .92) and ELB conditions (P = .18).
ELB albuterol lavage may be a viable option to reverse bronchoconstriction in intubated patients with limited response to traditional aerosolized albuterol via MDI.
雾化吸入沙丁胺醇是治疗支气管痉挛的主要方法;然而,几乎没有数据评估将支气管扩张剂气管内液体推注(ELB)直接注入气道的临床效果。
本随机试验旨在评估通过人工气道进行沙丁胺醇灌洗并辅以患者体位调整的疗效。因急性呼吸衰竭接受机械通气且有支气管痉挛临床表现的受试者,最初被分配接受通过定量吸入器(MDI)给予的传统沙丁胺醇,或通过ELB灌洗给予沙丁胺醇,在4小时洗脱期后接受另一种治疗。在基线以及治疗后5分钟和30分钟收集临床数据。
本研究纳入了14名受试者(5名男性,9名女性;平均年龄57.5岁)。在最初接受ELB的组中,气道峰压显著降低(P = 0.02),从基线到治疗后30分钟以及从治疗后5分钟到30分钟,气道阻力平均评分显著降低(P < 0.001和P = 0.003),后续MDI治疗未见显著效果。在最初接受MDI治疗的组中,未观察到对气道峰压或气道阻力有显著影响。ELB治疗后5分钟时S(pO2)升高。相比之下,MDI治疗后30分钟时S(pO2)降低。ELB治疗后平均动脉压降低。ELB治疗后心率变化模式与MDI治疗后相似,从基线起在5分钟时显著升高(P < 0.01),随后在30分钟时显著降低(P < 0.001)。在MDI(P = 0.92)和ELB(P = 0.18)给药后的每个时间间隔,动态顺应性均无差异。
对于经MDI给予传统雾化沙丁胺醇反应有限的插管患者,ELB沙丁胺醇灌洗可能是逆转支气管痉挛的可行选择。