Suppr超能文献

重新粘结到牙釉质上的瓷贴面的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength of porcelain veneers rebonded to enamel.

作者信息

St Germain H A, St Germain T H

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):E112-21. doi: 10.2341/14-123-L. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

Abstract

In this laboratory research, shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure of veneers rebonded to enamel in shear compression were determined. Three groups (A, B, and C; n=10 each) of mounted molar teeth were finished flat using wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper, and 30 leucite-reinforced porcelain veneers (5.0 × 0.75 mm) were air abraded on the internal surface with 50 μm aluminum oxide, etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, and silanated. The control group (A) veneer specimens were bonded to enamel after etching with 37% phosphoric acid using bonding resin and a dual cure resin composite cement. Groups B and C were prepared similarly to group A with the exception that a release agent was placed before the veneer was positioned on the prepared enamel surface and the resin cement was subsequently light activated. The debonded veneers from groups B and C were placed in a casting burnout oven and heated to 454°C/850°F for 10 minutes to completely carbonize the resin cement and stay below the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the leucite-reinforced porcelain. The recovered veneers were then prepared for bonding. The previously bonded enamel surfaces in group B were air abraded using 50 μm aluminum oxide followed by 37% phosphoric acid etching, while group C enamel specimens were acid etched only. All specimens were thermocycled between 5°C and 55°C for 2000 cycles using a 30-second dwell time and stored in 37°C deionized water for 2 weeks. SBS was determined at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. SBS results in MPa for the groups were (A) = 20.6±5.1, (B) = 18.1±5.5, and (C) = 17.2±6.1. One-way analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant interactions (α=0.05), and Tukey-Kramer post hoc comparisons (α=0.05) detected no significant pairwise differences. An adhesive mode of failure at the enamel interface was observed to occur more often in the experimental groups (B = 40%, C = 50%). Rebonding the veneers produced SBS values that were not significantly different from the control group. Also, no significant difference in SBS values were observed whether the debonded enamel surface was air abraded and acid etched or acid etched only.

摘要

在这项实验室研究中,测定了重新粘结到牙釉质上的贴面在剪切压缩时的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和失效模式。将三组(A、B和C组,每组n = 10)已安装的磨牙用湿的600目碳化硅砂纸打磨平整,30颗白榴石增强瓷贴面(5.0×0.75毫米)在内表面用50μm氧化铝进行空气喷砂处理,用9.5%氢氟酸蚀刻,然后进行硅烷化处理。对照组(A组)的贴面标本在用37%磷酸蚀刻后,使用粘结树脂和双固化树脂复合粘结剂粘结到牙釉质上。B组和C组的制备方法与A组类似,不同之处在于在将贴面放置在制备好的牙釉质表面之前放置了脱模剂,随后对树脂粘结剂进行光固化。将B组和C组脱粘的贴面放入铸型焙烧炉中,加热至454°C/850°F 10分钟,使树脂粘结剂完全碳化,且温度保持在白榴石增强瓷的玻璃化转变温度(Tg)以下。然后对回收的贴面进行粘结准备。B组先前粘结的牙釉质表面先用50μm氧化铝进行空气喷砂处理,然后用37%磷酸蚀刻,而C组的牙釉质标本仅进行酸蚀刻。所有标本在5°C和55°C之间进行2000次热循环,保压时间为30秒,并在37°C去离子水中储存2周。以1.0毫米/分钟的十字头速度测定SBS。各组的SBS结果以MPa表示为:(A)= 20.6±5.1,(B)= 18.1±5.5,(C)= 17.2±6.1。单因素方差分析表明不存在显著相互作用(α = 0.05),Tukey - Kramer事后比较(α = 0.05)未检测到显著的成对差异。在实验组中观察到牙釉质界面处的粘结失效模式更常出现(B组 = 40%,C组 = 50%)。重新粘结贴面产生的SBS值与对照组无显著差异。此外,无论脱粘的牙釉质表面是经过空气喷砂和酸蚀刻还是仅进行酸蚀刻,SBS值均未观察到显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验