Suppr超能文献

通过清洁和再处理方案重新粘结的脱粘陶瓷修复体的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength of debonded ceramic restorations re-cemented by means of a cleaning and retreatment protocol.

作者信息

Pineda-Vásquez Luisa, Fons-Font Antonio, Bustos-Salvador Jose-Luis, Alonso-Pérez-Barquero Jorge, Román-Rodríguez Juan-Luis

机构信息

DDS, Lecturer in Prosthodontics. Department of Dental Medicine, Prosthodontic and Occlusion Teaching Unit, University of Valencia General Studies (UVGS), Spain.

DDS, PhD, MD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Dental Medicine, Prosthodontic and Occlusion Teaching Unit, UVGS, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jun 1;11(6):e506-e511. doi: 10.4317/jced.55706. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As there is no standard method for re-cementing debonded partial ceramic restorations, the aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a non-invasive thermal protocol for cleaning and retreatment, and to study its influence on shear bond strength.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty ceramic samples (IPS e.max CAD®) were bonded to composite cement cylinders and underwent a shear bond strength test (G1, n=20). A second group was created (G2, n=20), representing debonded restorations. To simulate debonding, the samples were artificially contaminated with composite cement. After debonding, these underwent a thermal protocol to remove remaining adhesive. After rebonding to the composite cement cylinders, samples underwent the shear bond strength test.

RESULTS

Median bond strengths for G1 and G2 were 7.28±3.23; 7.06±3.41 MPa, respectively, without significant difference between the groups (=0.983).

CONCLUSIONS

Debonded lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations should undergo a laboratory cleaning and retreatment protocol before being returned to the clinic for rebonding. Ceramic, adhesive debonding, shear bond strength, porcelain laminated veneers.

摘要

背景

由于对于重新粘结脱粘的部分陶瓷修复体尚无标准方法,本研究的目的是评估一种用于清洁和再处理的非侵入性热方案,并研究其对剪切粘结强度的影响。

材料与方法

将二十个陶瓷样本(IPS e.max CAD®)粘结到复合水泥圆柱体上,并进行剪切粘结强度测试(G1,n = 20)。创建了第二组(G2,n = 20),代表脱粘修复体。为模拟脱粘,样本被复合水泥人工污染。脱粘后,这些样本接受热方案以去除残留的粘结剂。重新粘结到复合水泥圆柱体上后,样本进行剪切粘结强度测试。

结果

G1和G2的中位粘结强度分别为7.28±3.23;7.06±3.41MPa,两组之间无显著差异(= 0.983)。

结论

脱粘的二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷修复体在返回临床重新粘结之前应进行实验室清洁和再处理方案。陶瓷、粘结剂脱粘、剪切粘结强度、瓷贴面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4150/6645257/b831a18be3ab/jced-11-e506-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验