Tarescavage Anthony M, Corey David M, Gupton Herbert M, Ben-Porath Yossef S
a Department of Psychology , Kent State University.
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(4):382-94. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.995800. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scores for 145 male police officer candidates were compared with supervisor ratings of field performance and problem behaviors during their initial probationary period. Results indicated that the officers produced meaningfully lower and less variant substantive scale scores compared to the general population. After applying a statistical correction for range restriction, substantive scale scores from all domains assessed by the inventory demonstrated moderate to large correlations with performance criteria. The practical significance of these results was assessed with relative risk ratio analyses that examined the utility of specific cutoffs on scales demonstrating associations with performance criteria.
对145名男性警官候选人的明尼苏达多相人格量表-2-修订版得分与他们试用期初期的现场表现主管评级和问题行为进行了比较。结果表明，与普通人群相比，这些警官在实质性量表上的得分明显更低且变化更小。在对范围限制进行统计校正后，该量表评估的所有领域的实质性量表得分与绩效标准呈现出中度到高度的相关性。通过相对风险比分析评估了这些结果的实际意义，该分析检验了在与绩效标准显示出关联的量表上特定临界值的效用。
