Lutsep Helmi L, Barnwell Stanley L, Larsen Darren T, Lynn Michael J, Hong Mindy, Turan Tanya N, Derdeyn Colin P, Fiorella David, Janis L Scott, Chimowitz Marc I
From the Department of Neurology (H.L.L., D.T.L.), and Department of Neurological Surgery and Dotter Interventional Institute (S.L.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (M.J.L., M.H.); Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (T.N.T., M.I.C.); Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (C.P.D.); Department of Neurological Surgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY (D.F.); and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.).
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):775-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007752. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
Stenting has been used as a rescue therapy in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis and a transient ischemic attack or stroke when on antithrombotic therapy (AT). We determined whether the stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial supported this approach by comparing the treatments within subgroups of patients whose qualifying event (QE) occurred on versus off of AT.
The primary outcome, 30-day stroke and death and later strokes in the territory of the qualifying artery, was compared between (1) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting plus aggressive medical therapy (PTAS) versus aggressive medical management therapy alone (AMM) for patients whose QE occurred on versus off AT and between (2) patients whose QE occurred on versus off AT separately for the treatment groups.
Among the 284/451 (63%) patients who had their QE on AT, the 2-year primary end point rates were 15.6% for those randomized to AMM (n=140) and 21.6% for PTAS (n=144; P=0.043, log-rank test). In the 167 patients not on AT, the 2-year primary end point rates were 11.6% for AMM (n=87) and 18.8% for PTAS (n=80; P=0.31, log-rank test). Within both treatment groups, there was no difference in the time to the primary end point between patients who were on or off AT (AMM, P=0.96; PTAS, P=0.52; log-rank test).
SAMMPRIS results indicate that the benefit of AMM over PTAS is similar in patients on versus off AT at the QE and that failure of AT is not a predictor of increased risk of a primary end point.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
对于接受抗栓治疗(AT)时发生颅内动脉狭窄并伴有短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中的患者,支架置入术已被用作一种挽救性治疗方法。我们通过比较符合条件事件(QE)发生时正在接受AT治疗与未接受AT治疗的患者亚组中的治疗方法,来确定颅内动脉狭窄的支架置入术与积极药物治疗(SAMMPRIS)试验是否支持这种治疗方法。
比较以下两组患者的主要结局,即30天内的卒中、死亡以及符合条件动脉供血区域随后发生的卒中情况:(1)对于QE发生时正在接受AT治疗与未接受AT治疗的患者,经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入术联合积极药物治疗(PTAS)与单纯积极药物治疗(AMM);(2)对于治疗组,分别比较QE发生时正在接受AT治疗与未接受AT治疗的患者。
在284/451(63%)例QE发生时正在接受AT治疗的患者中,随机分配至AMM组(n = 140)的患者2年主要终点发生率为15.6%,PTAS组(n = 144)为21.6%(P = 0.043,对数秩检验)。在167例未接受AT治疗的患者中,AMM组(n = 87)的2年主要终点发生率为11.6%,PTAS组(n = 80)为18.8%(P = 0.31,对数秩检验)。在两个治疗组中,接受或未接受AT治疗的患者达到主要终点的时间没有差异(AMM组,P = 0.96;PTAS组,P = 0.52;对数秩检验)。
SAMMPRIS试验结果表明,在QE发生时正在接受AT治疗与未接受AT治疗的患者中,AMM相对于PTAS的益处相似,并且AT治疗失败并非主要终点风险增加的预测因素。