• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有症状颅内狭窄的管理

Management of Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis.

作者信息

Hoak David A, Lutsep Helmi L

机构信息

OHSU Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

OHSU Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, CR 131, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):83. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0762-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-016-0762-5
PMID:27443379
Abstract

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is a common cause of stroke worldwide, causing approximately 10 % of strokes in the USA and up to 50 % in Asian populations. Recurrent stroke risks are particularly high in those with a stenosis of 70 % or more and a recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Warfarin has been associated with higher major hemorrhage rates and no reduction of recurrent stroke compared to aspirin in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. After early trials showed the feasibility of stenting, two randomized trials compared stenting plus medical management to medical management alone in symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Stenting was linked with increased risk and showed no benefit in any subpopulation of patients. Aggressive medical management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial was associated with half the risk of stroke compared to that in similar patients in a previous symptomatic intracranial stenosis trial after adjustment of confounding characteristics. Aggressive medical management comprises risk factor control, including a target systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg, a low density lipoprotein <70 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1C <7.0 %, and lifestyle management that incorporates exercise, smoking cessation and weight management, and the use of antithrombotics.

摘要

颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病是全球范围内中风的常见病因,在美国约占中风病例的10%,在亚洲人群中占比高达50%。对于颅内血管狭窄达70%及以上且近期有短暂性脑缺血发作或中风的患者,复发性中风风险尤其高。在有症状性颅内狭窄的患者中,与阿司匹林相比,华法林与更高的严重出血率相关,且不能降低复发性中风的风险。早期试验证明了支架置入术的可行性后,两项随机试验将支架置入术联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗用于有症状性颅内狭窄的患者进行了比较。支架置入术与风险增加相关,且在任何亚组患者中均未显示出益处。在颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性中风(SAMMPRIS)试验中,与之前有症状性颅内狭窄试验中类似患者相比,经过混杂因素调整后,积极药物治疗使中风风险降低了一半。积极药物治疗包括危险因素控制(目标收缩压<140 mmHg、低密度脂蛋白<70 mg/dL、糖化血红蛋白<7.0%)、包括运动、戒烟和体重管理的生活方式管理以及使用抗栓药物。

相似文献

1
Management of Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis.有症状颅内狭窄的管理
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):83. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0762-5.
2
Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study.SAMMPRIS 研究后,对于症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者,血管成形术不伴支架置入治疗能否替代支架置入和强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bcb8.
3
Intracranial stenosis: impact of randomized trials on treatment preferences of US neurologists and neurointerventionists.颅内狭窄:随机试验对美国神经科医生和神经介入医生治疗偏好的影响。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(3):203-11. doi: 10.1159/000358120. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
4
Design of the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis trial.颅内狭窄患者支架置入和强化药物治疗预防卒中复发试验的设计。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;20(4):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.001.
5
Relationship between Risk Factor Control and Compliance with a Lifestyle Modification Program in the Stenting Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial.颅内狭窄支架置入强化药物治疗预防复发性卒中试验中危险因素控制与生活方式改变计划依从性之间的关系
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;27(3):801-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
7
Concomitant Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Increase the 30-Day Risk of Stroke in Patients Undergoing Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Stenting.合并无症状颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄会增加有症状颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄支架置入患者30天的卒中风险。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):479-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的治疗。
Rev Neurol Dis. 2008 Summer;5(3):117-24.
9
Early aggressive medical management for patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.有症状性颅内狭窄患者的早期积极医疗管理。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Jan;22(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
10
Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Stenoses.颅内狭窄的诊断与治疗
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;25 Suppl 2:307-16. doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0462-3. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Medium-term results of undersized angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with Enterprise.使用Enterprise支架对有症状的重度颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄进行小型血管成形术和支架置入术的中期结果
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Oct;25(5):484-490. doi: 10.1177/1591019919832244. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Enrollment volume effect on risk factor control and outcomes in the SAMMPRIS trial.SAMMPRIS试验中入组数量对危险因素控制及结局的影响。
Neurology. 2015 Dec 15;85(24):2090-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002191. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
2
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
Dual antiplatelet therapy in stroke and ICAS: Subgroup analysis of CHANCE.
卒中与颅内动脉粥样硬化的双重抗血小板治疗:CHANCE研究的亚组分析
Neurology. 2015 Sep 29;85(13):1154-62. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001972.
4
Do Patient Characteristics Explain the Differences in Outcome Between Medically Treated Patients in SAMMPRIS and WASID?患者特征能否解释SAMMPRIS和WASID研究中接受药物治疗患者的结局差异?
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2562-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009656. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial.球囊扩张颅内支架与药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中风险的影响:VISSIT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
6
Endovascular therapy for atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: back to the drawing board.动脉粥样硬化性颅内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗:回到绘图板(重新开始)
JAMA. 2015;313(12):1219-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1276.
7
Outcome in patients previously on antithrombotic therapy in the SAMMPRIS trial: subgroup analysis.SAMMPRIS试验中既往接受抗栓治疗患者的结局:亚组分析
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):775-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007752. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南》。
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
Rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial.颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)试验中积极危险因素管理的原理、设计与实施
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):e51-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966911.