• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流行病学是否变得痴迷于方法?从历史角度看流行病学经典(1945-1965 年)阶段方法的地位。

Has epidemiology become infatuated with methods? A historical perspective on the place of methods during the classical (1945-1965) phase of epidemiology.

机构信息

Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY 11367; email:

出版信息

Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:69-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122403. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122403
PMID:25594331
Abstract

Before World War II, epidemiology was a small discipline, practiced by a handful of people working mostly in the United Kingdom and in the United States. Today it is practiced by tens of thousands of people on all continents. Between 1945 and 1965, during what is known as its "classical" phase, epidemiology became recognized as a major academic discipline in medicine and public health. On the basis of a review of the historical evidence, this article examines to which extent classical epidemiology has been a golden age of an action-driven, problem-solving science, in which epidemiologists were less concerned with the sophistication of their methods than with the societal consequences of their work. It also discusses whether the paucity of methods stymied or boosted classical epidemiology's ability to convince political and financial agencies about the need to intervene in order to improve the health of the people.

摘要

第二次世界大战之前,流行病学是一门规模较小的学科,只有少数人从事这方面的工作,主要分布在英国和美国。如今,它在各大洲都有数以万计的人在从事。在被称为“经典”阶段的 1945 年至 1965 年间,流行病学被公认为医学和公共卫生领域的一门主要学术学科。本文通过对历史证据的回顾,探讨了经典流行病学在多大程度上是一个行动驱动、解决问题的科学的黄金时代,在这个时代,流行病学家不太关注方法的复杂性,而更关注他们工作的社会后果。本文还讨论了方法的匮乏是否阻碍或促进了经典流行病学使政治和金融机构相信有必要进行干预以改善人民健康的能力。

相似文献

1
Has epidemiology become infatuated with methods? A historical perspective on the place of methods during the classical (1945-1965) phase of epidemiology.流行病学是否变得痴迷于方法?从历史角度看流行病学经典(1945-1965 年)阶段方法的地位。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:69-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122403. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
2
Skepticism, statistical methods, and the cigarette: a historical analysis of a methodological debate.怀疑主义、统计方法与香烟:一场方法论辩论的历史分析
Perspect Biol Med. 2004 Spring;47(2):244-61. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2004.0032.
3
"Association or causation?" The debate on the scientific status of risk factor epidemiology, 1947-c. 1965.“关联还是因果关系?”关于风险因素流行病学科学地位的争论,1947年至约1965年
Clio Med. 2005;75:39-74.
4
Causes, risks, and probabilities: probabilistic concepts of causation in chronic disease epidemiology.病因、风险和概率:慢性病流行病学中的因果概率概念。
Prev Med. 2011 Oct;53(4-5):232-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Research on smoking and lung cancer: a landmark in the history of chronic disease epidemiology.吸烟与肺癌的研究:慢性病流行病学史上的一个里程碑。
Yale J Biol Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;63(1):29-46.
6
Stories from the evolution of guidelines for causal inference in epidemiologic associations: 1953-1965.从流行病学关联中因果推断指南的演变看故事:1953-1965 年。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec 15;176(12):1071-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws374. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
Epidemiology: second-rate science?
Public Health Rep. 1998 Jul-Aug;113(4):312-20.
8
Lung cancer, chronic disease epidemiology, and medicine, 1948-1964.肺癌、慢性病流行病学与医学,1948 - 1964年
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2004 Jul;59(3):329-74. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrh088.
9
Tobacco as a cause of lung cancer: some reflections.烟草作为肺癌的一个病因:一些思考。
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Nov 1;146(9):687-94. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009342.
10
Sir Richard Doll.
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):448. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67047-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Tobacco Cessation in Primary Health Care.基层医疗保健中与戒烟相关的因素
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb 19;25(4):e551-e556. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722164. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Are Greenland, Ioannidis and Poole opposed to the Cornfield conditions? A defence of the E-value.格陵兰、约阿尼迪斯和普尔是否反对科菲尔德条件?对E值的辩护。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 May 9;51(2):364-371. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab218.
3
Pandemics and the development of scientific methods in the history of epidemiology.大流行与流行病学史上科学方法的发展。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2020 Sep 30;51(3):e104564. doi: 10.25100/cm.v50i3.4556.
4
The Population Health OutcomEs aNd Information EXchange (PHOENIX) Program - A Transformative Approach to Reduce the Burden of Chronic Disease.人群健康结果与信息交流(PHOENIX)项目——减轻慢性病负担的变革性方法
Online J Public Health Inform. 2020 May 16;12(1):e3. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10456. eCollection 2020.
5
Pandemics and methodological developments in epidemiology history.流行病学历史中的大流行病与方法学发展。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
Perspectives on the Future of Epidemiology: A Framework for Training.展望流行病学的未来:培训框架。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 1;189(7):634-639. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa013.
7
Critical epidemiology in action: Research for and by indigenous peoples.实践中的批判性流行病学:原住民开展的研究及为原住民开展的研究
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Sep 10;6:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.003. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Epidemiology at a time for unity.团结时刻的流行病学。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1366-1371. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy179.
9
For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates.赞成与反对方法论:对近期因果推断和统计推断争议的一些观点。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Caution: work in progress : While the methodological "revolution" deserves in-depth study, clinical researchers and senior epidemiologists should not be disenfranchised.注意:工作进行中:虽然方法学“革命”值得深入研究,但临床研究人员和资深流行病学家不应被剥夺权利。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;31(6):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0181-3. Epub 2016 Jul 14.