White C
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yale J Biol Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;63(1):29-46.
This paper describes the history of the epidemiologic research on lung cancer prior to 1970 and its effect on chronic disease epidemiology. In the 1930s, epidemiology was largely concerned with acute infectious diseases. As the evidence grew that the incidence of lung cancer was increasing among men, however, epidemiologists undertook research into the etiology of the disease. In 1950, Doll and Hill, in England, and Wynder and Graham, in the United States, published substantial case-control studies that implicated the use of tobacco as a major risk factor for the disease. A controversy developed over the credibility of this finding and was increased in 1954 when a cohort study by Doll and Hill and another by Hammond and Horn each gave estimates that the risk of lung cancer was greatly increased among smokers relative to the risk among comparable non-smokers. An account is given of the disputes surrounding these and related studies. The controversy had a stimulating effect in fostering the developing discipline of chronic disease and epidemiology.
本文描述了1970年以前肺癌流行病学研究的历史及其对慢性病流行病学的影响。在20世纪30年代,流行病学主要关注急性传染病。然而,随着有证据表明男性肺癌发病率在上升,流行病学家开始对该疾病的病因进行研究。1950年,英国的多尔和希尔以及美国的温德尔和格雷厄姆发表了大量病例对照研究,指出吸烟是该疾病的主要危险因素。围绕这一发现的可信度产生了争议,1954年,多尔和希尔的队列研究以及哈蒙德和霍恩的另一项队列研究分别给出了估计结果,即吸烟者患肺癌的风险相对于可比的非吸烟者大大增加,这使得争议进一步加剧。文中讲述了围绕这些及相关研究的争议。这场争议对促进慢性病和流行病学这一新兴学科的发展起到了刺激作用。